Our next big action will take place on July 10th. On that day we are going to hold an informational picket day of action. This means we will organize info pickets all over the state in as many worksites as possible to put pressure on management to settle a fair contract. In Salem, we are hosting one large picket at the Governor’s office. So, Salem workers should plan to attend that picket. Outside of Salem, we want to organize as many pickets at worksites as possible.
If you don’t see a picket located near you and you want to change that you can contact us and help organize one by filling out this form.
Next week, we will release a schedule of trainings for people to attend to learn about how to organize an info picket at their worksite.
In the meantime, please fill out the interest form above if you want to organize an info picket in your office.
Here is where bargaining currently stands:
See it in other languages here: Español - Русский - Tiếng Việt
Proposal | Our Proposals | Management’s Proposals |
---|---|---|
Cost of Living Increases | July 1, 2025 – 8% July 1, 2026 – CPI-W +5%, but no less than 5% | December 1, 2025 – 2.3% December 1, 2026 – 3% |
Steps | Steps locked in for the CBA. 2 new steps (removing bottom 2 steps where they are not truncated). Accelerated timeline for longterm employees to move to new steps. | Steps locked in. Status quo on everything else |
Health Insurance | Highest cost plan will have a 95%/5% premium share. All other plans would be paid at 100% by the State. Protect gender-affirming care in our health insurance. | Status Quo |
Holidays | Add Indigenous Peoples’ Day and Transgender Day of Visibility | No new holidays |
Vacation | Increase vacation leave to have parity with management. Allow people carrying high levels of vacation an ability to cash out more frequently | Status Quo |
Personal Leave Days | Increase everybody’s personal leave by 8 hours for a total (32 hours). People who work fully in-person would get an additional 8 hours on top of that (40). | Status Quo |
Discrimination | Discrimination grievances can proceed to Arbitration. Investigators must be trauma informed. Grievant kept safe during the process. Stewards can be present for professional workplace policy complaints when it involves protected classes. | Remove current discrimination process - replace with complaint procedure. Remove Equity and Non-Discrimination Initiative. |
Workload | On-Call compensation changed from 1 hour pay for every 6 hours to 1 hour pay for every 3 hours. Increase specificity for mgmt responses to workload prioritization requests. Workload models that are reviewed by LMCs for all classifications in all agencies. Workload analysis when layoff occurs evaluating impact on staff and public. Increases for language differentials. | Status quo |
Inclement/Hazardous Conditions | DAS is decision maker on all closures. No limit on paid leave for closures. Alternate worksite cannot require travel through inclement/hazardous conditions. Employees without current remote work agreement cannot be required to work remotely. Non-essential workers required to work during a closure are paid the essential worker differential. | Remove requirement to post closure and curtailment notifications by 5am. |
Layoff | No contractors to replace laid off workers. Workload analysis when layoff occurs that evaluates impact on staff and public. Retraining requirements when layoffs occur. Remote workers assigned to the closest worksite by driving distance to their residence. | Status quo |
Artificial Intelligence | No tracking employee usage and employees trained on new systems. Human oversight of AI systems. AI not used in personnel processes. No position authority reduction b/c of AI. Union Right to Information: annual report, etc. | Status quo |
Safety | Worker pronouns excluded from public information requests. Truncated names used where last names can be avoided. Email addresses will not contain employee's full names. Differential for ODHS workers investigating unregulated environments/residences. Supervisor changed when professionalism complaints are filed. | Status quo |
Español - Русский - Tiếng Việt
6/13
This week in bargaining we made movement on some key issues. The first was our economic proposal. We determined now is the right time to move because we are getting more clarity on what is happening federally, and the May revenue forecast came in. It is lower than anticipated and gives a negative outlook for Oregon, suggesting there could be a recession. The team decided to tie the COLA in the first year to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) in this proposal to better reflect what we heard on the bargaining survey. Our proposal to management yesterday was:
- CPI plus 3% on July 1, 2025, but not less than 4% (with the current CPI, this would result in a COLA of about 5.3%)
- CPI plus 4% on July 1, 2026, but not less than 4% (with current CPI, this would result in a COLA of about 6.3%)
We also made movement on our health insurance proposal:
- We moved to status quo on premium share (1% premium share on the lower cost plans and 5% on the higher cost plans). However, we restructured how we talk about those plans in the contract to better reflect the bigger increases we’ve been seeing over the last few years.
- We moved off of our proposal that asked the State to guarantee gender-affirming care. The State flagged to us that this is not something we can bargain over because we are prohibited from bargaining over plan design. Our legal staff agreed with that assessment. Currently there are protections for this care under Oregon State law and our union is committed to protecting that law.
We also passed one package to management yesterday and they passed one package to us.
Our package:
- Article 13 – Contracting Out – We passed back our original proposal that would require the state to hire people back from the layoff list if they are qualified to do work that would be contracted out.
- LOA (Letter of Agreement) on ADA – We reiterated our concerns about the non-specific responses we get in the denials of ADA requests.
- New LOA on Employee Monitoring – We made some changes to our proposal to reflect feedback we heard from the State, but we continued pushing to protect employees from unjust discipline.
- Criminal Background Checks- We agreed to current contract language on criminal background checks after hearing from the State about how hard it is to write language that would work for every agency. We did share with the State that we would like them to have a higher level of transparency when it comes to what will be looked at in the background check so that people can navigate the process better.
Management’s package for us focused on the articles that address leave. Last week we gave management a response to this package, which includes bereavement leave, holidays, leaves without pay, and vacation, among others. This week they gave us a counter.
- Article 66 – Vacation Leave. They removed vacation from this package so that we can have conversations about it separately.
- They included a new LOA on hardship leave that would make it more accessible to people.
- On all other pieces of this package, they did not make any movement.
We have worked with the State to temporarily pause mediation so that we can have people observe our bargaining sessions. We had observers join us this week as we met virtually. Look for an invitation to observe our session next week!
6/6
As we communicated in our last update, we filed for mediation in May. We expected to continue open bargaining during these sessions, but were informed in the morning on Wednesday by our mediator that they do not allow this practice during mediation. Our team was surprised by this and is discussing how best to proceed with that information.
During our session on Thursday morning, we exchanged two packages with management. Our union team gave management a counter proposal on a package that contained a number of proposals related to types of leave. A few highlights from the package are
- Article 55 – Personal Leave Days: We modified our proposal focus solely winning eight additional hours of personal business leave for workers that work fully in person.
- Article 66 – Vacation Leave: We continue to propose that we should accrue vacation at the same rate as management.
- Article 58 – Holidays: We moved off of our proposal to create two new holidays – Transgender Day of Visibility and Indigenous Peoples’ Day. The team believes that there is no path to two new holiday and so removed Transgender Day of Visibility from our proposal to focus on Indigenous People’s Day, which we have been in conversation with management about for a couple of contract cycles now.
- Article 61 – Leaves of Absence without Pay: We continue to propose that being in leave without pay status not impact your leave accruals (sick leave, vacation leave) until you have been in leave without pay status for thirty days in a calendar year.
Management passed a package to our team that included “nos” to a number of our proposals including:
- Article 132 – Background Checks: where we proposed to make the process more transparent and to add protections for people going through the process.
- Article 13 – Contracting Out: where we proposed language to ensure that employees cannot be laid off and then replaced by contractors.
- New LOA – Employee Monitoring: where we proposed that the employer not be able to use the tools they have for managing property (fleet cars, phones) as part of the disciplinary process for employees.
5/23
This week, we reached a tentative agreement on a package of proposals that included some wins for union rights. We also fought off a bad proposal on required reporting for policy violations on the Contract Specialist program.
One of the most concerning proposals from management during this round of negotiations is their proposal to remove all discrimination protections from the contract. Our team asked management to speak to this proposal to better explain their intent. Management gave a presentation on the Department of Administrative Services (DAS) internal investigation unit and their investigation process. The presentation only reinforced what we already knew: workers need discrimination protections in their collective bargaining agreement!
Management’s process lacks transparency, accountability and trauma-informed practices. Management’s attempt to cut discrimination protections from the contract is unacceptable.
More details on this week’s session are on our website – click here to get up to speed.
The rest of negotiations this week focused on two package proposals
We continued to negotiate on the package management proposed two weeks ago and ultimately reached a tentative agreement on this package. Included in this package:
- Two new seats added to the central table bargaining team to increase member involvement in bargaining
- Paid prep time for Labor Management Committee (LMC) prep meetings
- Rejected management’s proposal requiring the union to tattle on Contract Specialists on state policy violation.
- The Union withdrew its proposal on truncated names recognizing that this work might be better done at individual agency LMCs.
- We also agreed to remove the AI proposal from the package so that it could be negotiated separately.
We’re currently reviewing management’s second package, which includes a proposal to allow workers to talk with recruiters on paid time. The rest focuses on leave proposals, and we’ll have more to report after the next bargaining session.
5/9
We received a package proposal from the State that included our Contract Specialist LOA, our Negotiations Procedures article, and our Labor-Management Committee article among others. The team will be working through their package proposal as, like most package proposals, it contains some things that we like (increasing the size of our central table bargaining team from ten to twelve) and some things that we don’t like a no on our name truncation proposal.
Over the last week our bargaining team has traveled around the state to give updates and have discussions with members about bargaining. The team visited nearly 100 worksites and had conversations with hundreds of workers about what their priorities were and what they hope to see in a new contract.
During the roadshow, the team heard that COLAs, health care and new Steps continue to be high priorities. Currently management has nothing on the table regarding a new top step and we heard loud and clear that we need a new top step that recognizes the years many state workers have put in—in order to win this, we are going to have to ramp up pressure on the state.
We also heard that folks are watching the unknowns in the budget and federal cuts closely, worried about their own jobs and their co-workers, which is why we think working on our layoff language is so important.
We also heard lots of feedback about management’s payroll proposal, and we know management’s current proposal is not acceptable to members. It's clear that if we are going to engage in a conversation about payroll, the state will need to commit to:
- No cut in our pay
- Workers can pay their bills
- Keeping our pay whole during any transition -- $500 is not nearly enough
- No cuts in hours
- Deductions spread out evenly on our paychecks
- Support to transition our bills to a new schedule
- Payroll system that doesn’t make mistakes
- Penalty pay when things go wrong
- Overtime to needs be taxed in a more standard way
Management continues to slowly build their payroll proposal, while we are asking question, we don’t believe they will create a proposal that works for us. But we want to see if we can build a system that will fix long-standing payroll problems and build in more protections for any future errors. That is why we will continue to engage members to identify our vision for a payroll system that works for frontline workers. Please keep your eyes open for future opportunities to participate in those discussions.
This week, we bargained with management for most of the day on Thursday. We were able to reach tentative agreements on three different articles. For two of the articles (Article 1 – Parties to the Agreement and Article 2 – Recognition) the changes were minor changes to update the names of some of the agencies. Our third tentative agreement was on Article 64 – Pre-Retirement Counseling Leave – again, we did not make major changes, but updated the language to include OPSRP and bring it into alignment with current practices.
4/25
This week in bargaining, we reached our first two tentative agreements (TA)! We were able to agree on a proposal that would allow SEIU-represented temporary employees to be considered as internal candidates when applying for positions with any State agency. And management agreed to a proposal that we passed to form a subcommittee with two representatives from each bargaining team to revamp the grievance form and bring it into the 21st century!
We started a conversation between the teams about personnel files to try to get a clear understanding of what a personnel file is within Workday and who has access to it. This is a conversation that we will be continuing in our upcoming bargaining sessions.
Thirteen different SEIU-represented classifications gave presentations to the bargaining teams this week to increase the salary range at which their classification is paid. Representatives from these classifications joined training sessions earlier this year to learn how to most effectively give these presentations. A lot of work goes into them, and we expect to get responses from the State’s team in a few weeks after they have had a chance to review the information.
Next week, we, the bargaining team, are hitting the road to travel around the state to visit dozens of worksites to update members about the bargaining campaign. We will be visiting nearly 100 worksites in every corner of the state between May 1st and May 7th. Though we would love to visit every worksite, we just won’t be able to make that happen. So, we are scheduling some regional off-site meetings so everyone can get updates even if we cannot go to your site. Please register for one of the offsite meetings below and join us if you can:
- Virtual Bargaining Team Roadshow Meeting- Saturday 5/3 at 10am
- Portland Bargaining Team Roadshow Meeting - Thursday, 5/1, at 6:00pm
- Medford Bargaining Team Roadshow Meeting - Saturday, 5/3, at 1:00pm
- McMinnville Bargaining Team Roadshow Meeting - Sunday, 5/4, at 5:00pm
- Eugene Bargaining Team Roadshow Meeting - Sunday, 5/4, at 2:00pm
- Pendleton Bargaining Team Roadshow Meeting - Monday, 5/5, at 6:30pm
We have gathered nearly 10,000 petition signatures so far during this campaign. These signatures have a huge impact because it shows us that you have our back on the important proposals that we have passed like COLAs, Healthcare and Workload and Safety. The petition closes on May 2nd, so you are running out of time to sign if you have not. Please click on this link, read the petition and add your name. Show management we are united and ready to fight!
We also are getting ready for our next action. On Thursday, June 5th we are holding a rally at the Oregon Capitol from 12:00pm - 2:00pm to fight for a state budget that reflects Oregon's values and allows us to get the money needed to pay for a fair contract. Oregonians depend on state services to make ends meet, to care for and educate children, to maintain affordable and quality healthcare and so much more. State workers provide those services and need a fair contract to continue to do that work! Register here today.
Last week we highlighted the proposed rate increases that health insurance carriers (Providence, Kaiser, and Moda) have proposed to the Public Employee Benefits Board. These increases would result in cuts to benefits that will harm employees and their families. We are pushing back and telling these companies to not price gouge at the expense of our benefits. Hundreds of workers have taken action and emailed the decision makers at Providence, Moda, and Kaiser to encourage them to reduce their proposed increases. Click here to join and tell these companies to back off!
4/11
We met with management on Wednesday, 4/9, which was the last day for each side to pass initial proposals. Now that all the proposals are out on the table, the stakes are clear. While our union bargaining team is fighting for members’ priorities including cost-of-living increases, reasonable workloads, employee safety, layoff protections and more, management is proposing serious takeaways, including removing non-discrimination protections from our union contract.
Non-discrimination
While we passed a series of proposals to increase support for our coworkers who are facing discrimination, management took the opposite tack and proposed reducing state workers’ access to union representation when they are discriminated against.
Management’s proposal included crossing out all of the language in our non-discrimination article (Article 22) and replacing it with a vague reference to employer policy. In addition, management’s proposal completely removes all rights for workers to choose union representation when dealing with discrimination. They also proposed removing all of the additional protections we bargained in our last contract for workers experiencing discrimination and harassment at work.
In contrast, our proposals included adding teeth to the non-discrimination language in our contract by making it so a neutral, third-party arbitrator could enforce it. We also proposed additional protections for workers who file non-discrimination grievances or workplace professionalism complaints.
It's clear that we are very far apart on this issue. 44% of workers who participated in our bargaining survey said they have experienced harm in the workplace because of their identity. We find it extremely concerning that the state is proposing to take away protections from those workers and to remove our Union’s ability to support them.
Workload Protections
We proposed these concepts on workload:
- A new Letter of Agreement that creates a standard process and timeline to create Workload Models for all classifications in all agencies that includes input from Labor Management Committees.
- Article 86 – Workload Prioritization: Increases specificity on how management responds and supports someone who makes a prioritization request.
- Article 34 – Standby Duty & On-Call Duty: Updates compensation for on-call pay to 1 hour of pay for each 3 hours of on-call.
- 32-hour work week: We proposed that the State develop a pilot program for a 32-hour work week with no reduction in compensation.
Employee Safety
We proposed these concepts on safety:
- Article 133 – Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking or Human Trafficking Victim Leave: Removes requirement for exhaustion of all forms of paid leave prior to use. Records under this article are confidential. Notice provided to victims if perpetrator is returned to work.
- We also proposed two new letters of agreement to protect people’s identity. One would ensure that people do not need to use their full names unless legally necessary for State business. The other would prevent the State from sharing worker’s pronouns in information requests from outside the state.
Economic Justice
In addition to the COLA and healthcare proposals we gave management in an earlier session, we also passed the following economic pieces:
- Differentials: We passed many changes including an increase to the shift differential and a change to the Essential Worker differential that would allow non-essential workers to receive it if they are required to work on an inclement weather/hazardous conditions leave day.
- Housing: This new letter of agreement creates a fund that loans money to workers to pay the upfront money required to rent a new apartment/house (like first and last month’s rent and a security deposit) or to help buy down the interest on a mortgage.
- Seasonal Workers: Our proposal makes several changes to the seasonal article to make the transition from season to season easier for workers and to give workers more access to fill gaps in seasonal positions.
Other changes
Management also proposed these changes yesterday:
- Article 21 – Grievance and Arbitration Procedure: Management proposed revamping this article for clarity. In addition, they made changes to some of their response timelines and added that all grievances must have a steward separate from the grievant at all steps.
- Article 57 – Bereavement: Brings bereavement leave in line with OFLA - must use accrued leave, then Leave Without Pay.
- Article 123 – Inclement or Hazardous Conditions: Changes requirement for closure notices before 5am to as soon as closure or curtailment decisions are made. Clarifies process for closure of office following the beginning of an employee’s shift.
We are hitting the road from May 1st to May 7th to meet with workers all across the state. Join one of our events to learn more about what is happening at the bargaining table and to share your priorities.
3/21
Both teams passed their economic packages today. Below you can see what each team proposed on some of the key issues:
Proposal | Our Proposals | Management’s Proposals |
---|---|---|
Cost of Living Increases | July 1, 2025 – 8% July 1, 2026 – CPI-W +5%, but no less than 5% | December 1, 2025 – 2.3% December 1, 2026 – 3% |
Steps | Steps locked in for the CBA. 2 new steps (removing bottom 2 steps where they are not truncated). Accelerated timeline for longterm employees to move to new steps. | Steps locked in. Status quo on everything else |
Health Insurance | Highest cost plan will have a 95%/5% premium share. All other plans would be paid at 100% by the State. Protect gender-affirming care in our health insurance. | Status Quo |
Holidays | Add Indigenous Peoples’ Day and Transgender Day of Visibility | No new holidays |
Vacation | Increase vacation leave to have parity with management. Allow people carrying high levels of vacation an ability to cash out more frequently | Status Quo |
Personal Leave Days | Increase everybody’s personal leave by 8 hours for a total (32 hours). People who work fully in-person would get an additional 8 hours on top of that (40). | Status Quo |
Payroll Process:
The state proposed changes to pay schedules that they believe will resolve ongoing issues with the Workday payroll system. Specifically, management proposed:
- Timesheets would be submitted for hours already worked, not hours we expect to work in the future (eliminating forecasting hours).
- Overtime-eligible workers would be paid an hourly wage rather than a monthly salary.
- The State will transition from paying monthly (12 pay periods per year) to paying bi-weekly (26 pay periods per year). Being paid, every other week rather than the first of the month.
They also proposed a $500 one-time payment to address the gap in pay that would be created when transitioning to paying for hours already worked.
They shared a memo with our bargaining team that outlines why they believe these changes will address issues with the payroll system. Management was also clear that this is their top priority in bargaining. Though they provided this memo, they have not proposed details on how they would like to calculate hourly wages or what the lag period would be if forecasting is eliminated.
We know that the current payroll system does not work well for everyone, especially lower income workers and people dealing with chronic medical conditions. That is why we have proposed penalty pay for workers whose paychecks are short or missing and that all workers have a right to a repayment plan if they are overpaid by the state, no matter why the overpayment happened.
Our payroll system needs to ensure that people living paycheck-to-paycheck have the money to pay their bills. The current system does not do this. Protecting everyone’s pay and making sure all state workers, but especially those of us who are low paid, are able make ends meet are our top priorities in negotiations on this issue.
What is next? Our plan is to create space over the next few months to hear from you about this proposal, and to have a broad conversation within our union about what our vision a functional, worker-centered payroll system should look like. Please be on the lookout for more info soon about how you can be part of that conversation.
3/12
Our team passed proposals from our 21st Century Workplace section of our platform. This included these concepts:
- Increasing protections for remote work agreements, improvements in the Union’s ability to protect remote work access, and more specific steps management must take when rescinding agreements.
- Improvements to the Inclement and Hazardous Conditions article.
- Implementing protections for workers for implementation of Artificial Intelligence in the workplace.
- Improvements to layoff protections.
- Penalty payments for payroll errors and access to payment plans for all overpayments.
- Clarity around workplace designation for remote workers.
Management still has not shared their proposals on economics or payroll changes involving Workday, though we expect those proposals in our next meeting. Management passed proposals integrating equal pay processes throughout all the position transitions an employee might make during their employment at the State. Our bargaining team is still in the process of reviewing these proposals.
We will meet with management at the Central Table again on March 20th and it’s going to be a big day. It is the last day that either side can pass an initial proposal! Both sides will be passing their economics and changes regarding the Workday system.
2/28
Bargaining is officially under way! Yesterday, we held our first full bargaining session with management, marking the start of exchanging proposals. Over a hundred members joined us on zoom, sending management a strong message—State workers are engaged and ready to fight for a fair contract.
In our opening statement, we laid out our union’s top priorities: Economic Justice, 21st Century Workplaces, Workload & Safety, and Union Power. You can check out our opening statement slide deck for more details.
While they didn’t actually offer proposals, management told us in their opening statement that they will be making proposals to change payroll processes. Specifically, they said they want to shift overtime eligible employees to hourly pay, move our pay periods to biweekly, and eliminate forecasting in timesheets. We don’t have specifics on the details of these proposals yet, but we will share more information with you once we do.
In addition to making our opening statement, our team also passed the proposals in our Union Power category, including:
-
-
- Strengthening our union by giving newly hired in-person workers the opportunity to meet with their union reps in-person during their new employee orientations
- Ending the state’s anti-union practice of giving management service employees higher pay than people in our bargaining unit who do the same work
- Improving the timelines in our grievance process to make it easier for stewards to enforce our contract
-
Our next bargaining sessions will be Wednesday, March 12th and Thursday, March 13th. Our negotiations are open for members of our union to observe, so be on the lookout for invitations!
2/6
State Bargaining is getting into full swing and while no proposals have been passed yet, we still have a lot to report! Firstly, thank you so much to the almost 8500 members that completed the bargaining survey. This was over 2000 more participants than in 2022 and we’re excited about that level of engagement. The elected bargaining team is reviewing the survey now to strategize the best way forward and we should have more information about our priorities after the bargaining conference next month. The team has also already met to elect their leading co-chairs. Congratulations to Angela Ward from ODFW and Joe Dyer from OHA – Pendleton Cottage. We know you have what it takes to lead our state workers to victory!
We know how important it is for state workers to win a fair contract and get wage increases that keep up with all the inflation and price gouging by greedy corporations over the past several years. Governor Tina Kotek needs to know that as well and that is why we have crafted an online action you can take to let her know she needs to support state workers during this difficult time by approving a fair budget and contract. Send a letter today!
1/29
Friday (1/31) is payday and it’s going to be a big one! Starting January 1st, you received a 6.55% COLA (Cost of Living Adjustment). This pay increase is a result of the hard work and determination of State workers during the 2023 bargaining campaign. They refused to accept the 2% increase management proposed and organized to win their largest pay increase in more than 50 years.
That’s the power of being in union with your coworkers. It’s also why union workers, on average make about 14% more than non union workers make. We can’t take that for granted, we need to stay organized and engaged so we can continue to win for everyone.
- Our bargaining team met with the State for the first time in December to approve ground rules for this year's negotiations. We will start meeting to share proposals in early February.
- Currently, our bargaining team is reviewing the thousands of bargaining surveys that Union members submitted. We collected 1,200 more surveys than last session, which tells us that State workers are ready to bargain!
Español - Русский - Tiếng Việt
6/13
This past week your Human Services Bargaining Team was able to bring home some victories for workplace democracy and recognition of special duties. We’ve reached tentative agreements on having union workers on interview panels when bargaining unit vacancies are being filled and a special pay differential for child welfare staff who must report to court hearings as part of their duties.
Unfortunately, many other critical issues are at a stalemate. After months of bargaining and countless hours spent in negotiations, the State has refused to give us a single proposal on workload, child welfare caseload ratios and paid critical incident leave. At the same time, they have rejected all union proposals on these issues outright. This is not a respectful way to bargain and a clear sign that we need to turn up the heat.
Our next bargaining session is on 6/25, and we want you to show up as an observer to show management how invested you are in resolving these issues. Keep an eye on your emails on that date to access the meeting link.
5/30
Thank you for the 50+ members who joined bargaining today to negotiate over health, safety and workload!
Workload is a top bargaining priority.
- The State did not respond to the Union’s legal request for copies of Workload Models and Remote Work guidelines. SEIU will pursue an Unfair Labor Practice charge against the State if management fails to respond.
- The State reported that Child Welfare is 125% overstaffed. Meanwhile, among primary staff last month: 43% of CPS staff, 29% of permanency staff and 19% of certification staff had caseloads above caseload ratios!
- We need to hear from Child Welfare staff who are assigned caseloads above approved ratios and the impacts that has on staff and clients! Submit your story here. https://forms.office.com/r/nXSP7EZzu4
On 5.28, SEIU bargained on the following items. The State did not respond to any proposals and did not show up with any counters:
- Article 32.1 Overtime. Exempt status FLSA employees overtime cap increased to 240 hours. Passed originally by SEIU on 3.19.25
- Article 86.1 Workload Prioritization (includes workload protections for all staff/puts CPS Caseload Ratios in the Contract). SEIU originally passed on 4.4.25, on 4.30 ER rejected the entire proposal. SEIU re-introduced on 5.28.
- Article 138.1 Working Remotely. Proposed clear guidelines for approving/denying remote work. SEIU proposed on 3.19.25. State failed to respond.
- Safety Package Proposal (A101, 103, 136). Includes mandatory safety plans at offices, paid critical incident leave, implementation of safety flags for difficult and sensitive clients. SEIU proposed on 3.5.25.
- LOA on call metrics. Ensure all workers are not unfairly monitored on work phone calls.
- LOA on Interview Rights. The right for SEIU members to sit on interview panels.
5/16
Management canceled this week's meeting because the LRU representative is on vacation. The next meeting is scheduled for 5/28.
5/2
SEIU’s bargaining team is disappointed by the State’s failure to address the Union’s major bargaining proposals. Our next bargaining date is not for another month:
Safety: The State rejected nearly all of the Union’s safety language, including paid critical incident leave, improved safety plans with a responsibility to notify employees and mandatory safety notices over Everbridge. The State was unable to answer basic safety questions including whose responsibility it is to write safety plans, where these plans live or how they are communicated to State workers. SEIU originally presented our safety proposals on March 5th and it appears that basic questions were left unanswered. Management’s response left us feeling that the State does not take safety seriously.
Workload models: The State rejected our proposal for all workers to have workload models and for the State to follow the Child Welfare caseload ratios without discussion.
Remote Work: The State rejected our remote work proposal in its entirety without discussion.
Join us on May 14th for our safety pickets! Check your email for more information. The plan is to hold the Safety Breaks at lunchtime (ex: 1130am-130pm) and you can work with an organizer about planning for the mid-morning or mid-afternoon 15-minute break. With lunchtime pickets, folks can rotate on the line for alternating lunch schedules. For remote workers, attend a Safety Break that is closest to where you live to show your solidarity! Contact your organizer for a list of CATs at your worksite, to inform them about the picket, to bring signs/swag, and to help order lunch.
4/18
Last month, we passed proposals to improve safety, remote work, unreasonable workloads and overtime. In February, we filed a request for information on safety and workload.
Two weeks ago, we scheduled a Union bargaining team work session to finalize our proposals. We expected management would use this time to review the Union’s safety, remote work and unreasonable workload proposals passed in March.
This week, however, state management cancelled our bargaining session at the last minute, saying they needed more time to prepare.
We meet next with management on April 30th and have only four bargaining sessions left to negotiate on critical issues raised by our members.
To date, the Department of Administration Services’ labor relations management team has yet to respond to any of our Union’s proposals or information requests.
We are disappointed and frustrated by how slowly management is moving, particularly since they have not addressed our safety, remote work or workload proposals with the urgency they deserve.
To date, we have passed, at the coalition table, proposals on the following articles:
- Article 10.1 Union Stewards
- Article 32.1 Overtime
- Article 40.1m Penalty Pay
- Article 45.1m filling of vacancies
- Article 45.1c filling vacancies
- Article 49.1 Trial Service
- Article 61.1 Leaves Without Pay
- Article 86.1 Workload Prioritization
- Article 90.1 Work Schedules
- Safety package Proposal (A101, 103, A136 relevant coalition subsections)
- 1 Working Remotely
- LOAs
- Master LOA tracking list
- Modification LOA 00.00-16-293 temp lodging
- Modification LOA 35.1.23-469 Metrics
- NEW LOA Telematics
- NEW LOA 10.1c & 10.1m Interview Panels
- NEW LOA Article 90.1c Employment
We invite you to join us as an observer to bargaining at our April 30th session. We will send out the participation link before the meeting.
4/4
NO ONE SHOULD FEEL UNSAFE AT WORK!
We have made proposals on Workload and Safety for ALL Workers in ALL ODHS/OHA/OED Programs to hold management accountable in creating safe workplaces and manageable workloads.
ODHS management states that Child Welfare is overstaffed by 125%. At the same time, safety incidents have increased dramatically coalition wide which coincides with significant increases in workload. Data has been provided by ODHS that Safety Incidents have risen 453% from 2019-2023. Of the data reported in 2023, over 78% of Safety Incidents reported were of a Medium to High Level of Severity.
Highlights of our Safety Proposals:
- Paid Critical Incident Leave for violence and trauma experienced at work.
- Supervisor and/or Expert led worksite safety plans and notify employees of safety incidents.
- Mandatory supervisor support for staff involved in safety incidents.
- Security guards at worksites with repeated safety incidents.
- Standard protocols when there is a safety incident at worksites.
List of Articles proposed:
- Article 49.1: Employees in the Human Services Coalition in a trial service for lateral transfer or promotion do not need management approval to return to a classification or comparable salary level, which the employee previously held unless charges are filed and they are discharged as provided in Article 20.
- To create equity for workers wishing to return to their original position if/when desired from a lateral transfer or promotion.
- Article 61.1: Being able to use Leave Without Pay without having to exhaust accrued leave. Listing instances to deny Leave Without Pay.
- Article 40.1(M): Intent of the parties that there shall be no “make work” assigned to employees who are called back to work for court appearances.
- Article 10.1: Improving language around using agency’s email system and including instant messaging system.
- Article 45. 1M: Improve hardship transfer process and prioritize internal candidates over external for promotions and lateral transfers. We want employees to only work ONE job when they've been promoted, not the new one AND the old one.
- 45.1C: Improving language to better define transfers and promotions. Prioritizing internal OED and ODHS/OHA candidates over external. Requiring management to provide a written explanation of a job denial. Increasing notification of program transfers from 5 to 30 days.
- 86.1M: Codifiying CW Workload models to hold management accountable and adding penalty pay for assigned work.
- 86.1: New language improving workload prioritization to eliminate progressive discipline related to workload, caseload, or timely assignments.
LOAs (Letters of Agreement):
- LOA 35.1 Recorded/Monitored Calls & Call Metrics: Intent is to not have calls and call metrics used as discipline but rather as training opportunities.
- Temporary Lodging LOA: $5 differential, contracted staff will be the ones awake, and yearly de-escalation training and protocol review will be provided for staff. Anytime weapons, drugs, etc. are confiscated from TL, then those items will be removed within two hours of the discovery. Shifts lasting 10 or more hours will be compensated with 20-minute rest periods.
3/21
The Human Services Coalition bargaining team has reached its first tentative agreement for this round of bargaining. They won a major victory with new scheduling bidding rights for the Oregon Child Abuse Hotline, an issue that’s been outstanding since last summer!
The team also submitted proposals to management regarding Article 32 – Overtime and Article 138 - Working Remotely.
- The overtime proposal included increasing the compensatory/straight time limit from 160 to 240 hours and allowing it to be cashed out monthly.
- The remote work proposal pushes back against the State’s arbitrary use of ‘business needs’ to end remote work agreements and sets up a process that forces the employer to justify what these needs are. They also proposed that workers can have international remote work agreements
Management did not present any proposals and did not respond to the safety package that the union passed previously.
3/5
The Human Services Coalition bargained with management on Feb 20th and March 5th. Below is some of what happened at the last bargaining sessions:
On February 20th, we proposed rules to support Oregon Child Abuse Hotline employees to create a fair system for the selection of new shifts. This is a continuation of an Unfair Labor Practice/Demand to Bargain charge that we filed back in the summer of 2024.
On March 5th, we continued our discussions on shift bidding and tumbling for the Oregon Child Abuse Hotline and we proposed a Safety Package Proposal (3 articles – 101 Safety & Health, 103 Difficult and Sensitive Clients, Article 136 Critical Incident Leave). These proposals would make improvements to protect the safety and health of State Workers, including:
-
- Paid critical incident leave for violence and trauma experienced at work
- Worksite safety plans and employee notification of safety incidents
- Mandatory supervisor support to staff involved in safety incidents.
- A boot allowance for Oregon Emergency Management facilities staff.
- Security guards at worksites with repeated safety incidents
We cannot win these things through negotiations alone. The best way to express our solidarity is through escalation starting with signing the bargaining petition and sharing your story:
Safety in the Workplace - No One Should Feel Unsafe at Work
Español - Русский - Tiếng Việt
6/13
The ODOT Coalition bargaining team met with management on June 10th and had a productive meeting with both sides passing packages. We passed three packages on a variety of issues including:
- Boots and safety clothing for ODOT and OPRD
- Increasing meal tickets and access at ODOT
- Overtime and on-call based on seniority at ODOT
- Boots and incident management rest at Forestry to break up long stints of working the fire line without a day off
- Fair consideration for internal candidates at DMV, OPRD and ODOT
- Protecting work schedule consistency at OPRD
- Improving conditions during trial service for returning seasonals at OPRD and Forestry
- Safety while working in illegal campsites
Members leaders, including someone from ODOT District 14, gave excellent presentations on these issues. They spoke about their importance and why they are a priority. Management passed back several proposals without making additional movement, instead reverting to their earlier positions. We still have not reached any tentative agreements with management on the 30 proposals that we have on the table, so we have scheduled an additional bargaining session for June 13th, ahead of our June 17th session.
5/30
The ODOT Coalition bargaining delegation met with management on May 27th when both sides passed packages with various proposals. We passed a package on issues impacting workers at the Department of Agriculture, Water Resources, and OWEB, including:
- Boots and safety clothing for people that work in the field at Water Resources.
- Boots and safety clothing for people that work in the field at Agriculture.
- A career ladder for Office Specialists and Administrative Specialists to gain experience and create mobility in the Natural Resource Specialist series.
Union members from the Department of Agriculture presented on issues impacting them and made compelling arguments for the Employer to provide safety clothing and internal mobility for workers.
Our team continues to work through additional issues including:
- Improving language to provide more transparency and fairness in hiring and promotions.
- Expanding use of critical incident leave.
- Creating safeguards for work in illegal campsites.
We have 30 proposals that remain on the table with two more sessions scheduled for next month. Our next session with management is June 10.
5/16
The ODOT Coalition bargaining delegation met with management on May 14 when we passed counter proposals on four packages, including:
- Removing CDL burden from low wage classifications at ODFW.
- Securing bargaining unit representation on hiring panels at OPRD.
- Improving conditions for firefighters and Incident Management Teams at Forestry.
- Improving safety clothing allowances at all agencies within the coalition.
- Increasing seniority rights at ODOT.
- Increasing meal tickets and access at ODOT.
Our team continues to work through additional issues including:
- Improving language to provide for more transparency and fairness in hiring and promotions.
- Expanding use of critical incident leave.
- Expanding vacation week of choice from one week per year to two weeks.
- Securing safety clothing and boot allowances at Agriculture, as well as creating career ladder opportunities within the agency.
Our next session with management is May 27.
5/2
The ODOT Coalition bargaining delegation met with management on April 30th and we received five packages of counter proposals. The packages bundle together their responses to the proposals we have passed to mgmt. since February. So far they are a mixed bag.
Our team is now working through those proposals and will offer additional counters at our next session on May 13th. We have not yet reached a tentative agreement on any of the 30 proposals we have on the table, and our team continues to work through a variety of issues, including:
- Safety: Expanding use of critical incident leave, and increases to safety gear
- Vacation use: Expanding week of choice from one week per year to two
- ODFW: Reducing CDL requirements for low wage workers
- OPRD: Inclusion of represented workers on hiring panels
- Agriculture: Creating a career ladder into the Natural Resource Specialist series
- ODOT: strengthening seniority rights for on-call and overtime
- ODF: Compensation and classification studies for Incident Management Teams and firefighting positions
4/18
The ODOT Coalition met with management on April 15 for our first session after the deadline passed for initial proposals. We now have a full lay of the land with 30 proposals on the table that we will negotiate in the weeks ahead to address a variety of issues including safety, vacation use, internal hiring, on-call and OT at ODOT, classification studies at ODF, improvements for low wage workers and critical incident leave. Mgmt. sent us counters on:
- Steward numbers at ODOT, DMV, OPRD, ODFW and ODF (Article 10.3)
- Filling of Vacancies and internal mobility (Article 45.3AB)
- Use of vacation leave at ODOT, DMV and OPRD and cancellation of vacation throughout the coalition (Article 66.3)
- Work schedules at OPRD (Article 90.3B)
- Special Provisions for safety (Article 113.3H,I)
It was notable that the Department of Agriculture continues to deny proposals that would provide safety measures for employees working in the field. The most recent example being their denial of our proposal to require two-way communication devices in vehicles when Agriculture employees are performing job duties in remote areas of the state. We will continue to advocate at the table for such safety measures for Ag workers.
Another notable moment was mgmt.’s response to our proposal to better define what “fair consideration” means in the hiring process of existing employees who are seeking opportunities within the agency. Mgmt. indicated that fairness would be too administratively burdensome.
Stay tuned for upcoming invitations to join bargaining as an observer via Zoom to show your support for the bargaining team.
4/4
Union bargaining team passes proposals to improve working conditions ahead of deadline
Your ODOT coalition bargaining team passed an additional 13 proposals, ahead of an April 4th deadline, addressing a variety of issues important to workers. A major theme of what your team is proposing is to put some teeth behind seniority language and to make sure it counts when considering who will be hired into new positions and who gets overtime. As the front line of your agencies your experience is extremely valuable and it’s time that management respects it. Putting in years of hard work needs to count for something. Here are the details:
- Amending overtime for ODOT to include seniority.
- Increasing meal tickets at ODOT.
- Improving transfer and promotion opportunities for internal candidates at DMV, ODOT and OPRD.
- Improving access to earned vacation hours for DMV, ODOT and OPRD.
- Ensuring communication devices are in field vehicles at Agriculture and OPRD.
- Creating a career ladder for OS (office specialist) and AS (administrative specialist) folks to move into the NRS (natural resource specialist) series at Agriculture (New Letter of Agreement).
- Creating light duty opportunities for folks at OPRD that sustain injuries (New Letter of Agreement).
- Increasing Union involvement in hiring panels and LMC at OPRD (New Letters of Agreement)
- Addressing sexual harassment and gender discrimination at ODF and OPRD (Letter of Agreement).
- Implementing safety measures for employees that are tasked to work around illegal campsites, including exposure to fentanyl, feces and bodily fluids (New Letter of Agreement).
- Creating a work group and class and comp study for all Incident Management Team positions and duties at ODF (New Letter of Agreement).
- Directing a class and comp study for wildland firefighting positions.
Management did not pass any more new proposals. Our team now shifts to develop counter proposals ahead of our next meeting with management on April 15th. Stay tuned and keep staying active!
3/21
On March 18th, the ODOT Coalition delegation met for the third session with management and passed three more initial proposals:
- A new article for ODOT that would clarify on-call assignments and use of vehicles during on-call.
- A new article to clarify that employees at ODFW and OPRD cannot be required to use their personal vehicle to conduct work.
- Amended the Union Rights article to improve steward representation at OPRD, DMV, ODF, ODFW and ODOT.
Management passed two more initial proposals:
- Changes to Article 45.3G that would impact how vacancies are filled, and how promotions and non-voluntary transfers are handled at the Department of Agriculture.
- A new ODOT-only article specifying when the Essential Worker Differential applies to maintenance crews.
Our team continues to work on initial proposals to pass before the April deadline. Stay tuned for opportunities in April and May to observe coalition bargaining via Zoom.
3/5
The ODOT Coalition bargaining team met with management last week and passed four more proposals to management around issues related to safety and workload. Specifically, we proposed:
-
- New language on critical incident leave to support workers that experience direct trauma at work, including verbal threats and witnessing fatalities.
- Expanding rest and recovery at Oregon Department of Forestry to meet industry standard after 21-day assignments on all-hazard incident management teams.
- Improving work schedules for Oregon Parks and Recreation Department.
- Improving CDL requirements for the lowest paid workers at Oregon Department of Fish Wildlife.
Management passed two proposals regarding returning seasonals at both Oregon Parks and Recreation Department and Oregon Department of Forestry. At both agencies, if a worker ends their first season and then accepts a position in the same classification at a different location, it is considered a lateral transfer if the employee completes their season and indicates an intention to return, and they will continue with the same trial service.
Management also passed their positions on existing Letters of Agreement. There was significant agreement in this area, with a few exceptions, including management’s position that the Oregon Department of Forestry will continue its commitment to confronting sexual harassment and discrimination at the agency via Labor Management Committees (LMC), but that the Oregon Parks and Recreation Department would like to end their commitment to discuss the problem with Union leaders at LMC.
2/21
This week marked our first coalition bargaining meetings with management. The State of Oregon workforce is divided up into four coalitions: Human Services, Institutions, ODOT and Special Agencies. We also negotiate at Central Table, where language that impacts everyone (including pay increases) is bargained. We will hold our first meeting at Central Table on Thursday, February 27th at 1:30pm.
At the ODOT coalition our team shared their framework for bargaining with management in this opening statement, highlighting that workers in the ODOT Coalition keep our roads safe, fight fires, care for our parks, and manage vital resources like fish, wildlife, minerals, agriculture and water.
We passed a proposal for seven agencies (ODOT, OPRD, ODF, ODFW, DOGAMI, Ag, and Water) to improve language in Article 122.3, which deals with boots, protective clothing and uniforms. Management passed a proposal to clarify who gets meal allowances in Article 33.3A.
Español - Русский - Tiếng Việt
6/13
This week was our second to last scheduled bargaining session. Coming into this session, management still owed us initial counters on 8 of our proposals. These counters were nowhere to be found. Our team expressed frustration about the lack of response to those proposals and said that we were not willing to both receive and settle proposals in our last bargaining session, we need more time to deliberate on them. Management heard our concerns and committed to having responses to all the proposals in our next bargaining session. In turn we scheduled one more additional full day session.
Our team passed management back responses on several of the different Article 45 proposals we have on the table, once again emphasizing our insistence on transferring and promoting people from within the agency whenever possible.
5/30
We came to work this week and are still waiting for management to pass counters on several of our proposals. We continue to work on proposals to get union members into interview spaces (New Letter of Agreement for Article 10) and protect workers from schedule modification without clear rules (Article 90.5). Management is taking aim at multiple agencies' language that protects represented workers when they apply for internal positions by proposing to blend this agency-specific language into one general article (Article 45.5).
We still feel as if we have a long way to go and very few bargaining sessions left. Keep talking to your co-workers about bargaining and showing up to participate in your sub-locals' meetings and join the June 5th Rally - the only way for us to win this contract is together!
5/16
This week management passed us 2 counter proposals. One of those counters was on a proposal we had passed that would make Labor Management Committees more accessible to smaller agencies within the coalition. Their second counter was on our work schedules proposal.
We passed a package with counters on managements proposals for ODE/DELC, and PERS and we continued our conversations about the safety proposals. Management continues to make little movement at the table and it is clear that their priorities do not include ensuring worker safety for those who are working in the field or engaging with members of the public.
5/2
This week, management’s team gave us four different counter proposals – they still owe us sixteen more, so there is a lot of work to be done!
One of their counters was on a proposal we made that would allow there to be a bargaining unit member, appointed by the union, on all hiring panels. We think that having a bargaining unit member on every interview panel not only creates transparency within the hiring process but also creates opportunities for people to gain a better understanding of what is being looked for in the interview process. In addition, it makes sense that people who are currently performing the work participate in choosing who might make a good co-worker. The counter proposal from management shows that they do not share these values.
Once again, in their counters to some of our proposals on Article 45 – Filling of Vacancies, the management team showed that their priorities are about the speed of the hiring process and not about how they can support current workers and their career development.
Finally, we were able to make a little progress on a proposal that we made for the Licensing Boards in getting Labor Management Committees to be something that would work in their Agencies despite the small numbers of employees at some of them.
4/18
We were able to reach agreement with management on five different proposals this past Tuesday. The agreements included:
- Additional stewards for BOLI
- Language at DCBS to strengthen a worker’s ability to transfer/promotion
- Increasing the number of comp time hours that workers at the licensing boards can accrue
We also spent time asking management clarifying questions around proposals that they gave us that would impact worker safety and accessibility in the workplace. While they were able to answer some of the questions, we are waiting for follow-up from them. We will be tackling these issues again in our next bargaining session.
4/4
On Tuesday, your Specials Coalition bargaining team and management both exchanged their final initial proposals.
- Our union team passed many proposals including ones that would create a standard practice at each agency for how leadwork assignments are being shared with workers and how they are being filled. We passed several proposals for different agencies focusing on how to make internal job opportunities – both transfers and promotions – available to current employees first.
- Management’s team passed very few proposals, but the ones that they did pass focused on speeding up the hiring process and rolling back gains that had been made in previous contracts.
Stay tuned for more updates in a couple of weeks.
3/21
At the Specials Coalition Bargaining table we passed a package of three proposals that all focus on safety. Two of the proposals are seeking to expand Letters of Agreement to the whole coalition that have been working successfully for a single agency. One outlines what happens when elevators are inoperable, and another creates a structure for workers to follow if they work in the public and have concerns about their safety. The third letter of agreement would require that all buildings that are open to the public undergo a safety assessment.
We also passed our remote work proposal seeking to both create clarity around what a “business need” actually is and to protect people from being hired into remote work position just to have that changed later on.
Management has not given us many proposals yet but will get us the majority of them in the next session.
We also already signed our first tentative agreement on a few pieces of housekeeping (correcting typos) in an Article!
3/5
The Specials Coalition bargaining team has been hard at work advocating for your needs, below is an update from our bargaining session.
-
-
- We passed two proposals that focus on bringing equity to our smallest agencies in the coalition, the Boards. We passed one proposal focusing on bringing their comp time accruals up to where others are and another proposal to make labor management committees more accessible.
- We passed the first of our Article 45 (Filling of Vacancies) proposals and so did management. Article 45 is always a conversation at this bargaining table as we try to ensure that workers can build careers at the State.
- We also spent some time talking with management about a proposal that we previously passed which would give the union representation on hiring committees, which would create a more transparent hiring process and help people understand the skills needed to interview well.
-
Español - Русский - Tiếng Việt
6/13
Your Union bargaining team met with management on Friday, June 6th, and we’re happy to report a productive session with agreements reached on several key articles across agencies. Here are the highlights:
Oregon State Hospital (OSH) & Pendleton Cottage (PC)
- Promotions: When a member is denied a promotion, they can now request the interview notes and scoring. HR will also offer coaching and advice to help members strengthen their interview skills.
- Vacation Seniority Rights: Members will now be able to exercise seniority once per year when there’s a conflict over vacation requests.
- Clothing & Uniform Reimbursements:
- Facilities Workers: $200 boot reimbursement per biennium
- Vocational Services, Environmental Services, Materials Management: $150 clothing reimbursement per biennium
- All: $75 per biennium for protective eyewear
- Continuing Education: Clarified the $1,000 reimbursement for Behavioral Health Specialists, Clinical Psychologists, and Psychiatric Social Workers.
- Labor/Management Engagement: Policies and procedures will now be reviewed and discussed during Labor/Management meetings.
Oregon State Hospital (OSH) Only
- Computer Access Time: Management has committed to ensuring employees have adequate time to access computers, even if it exceeds the current 15-minute limit when necessary.
Pendleton Cottage (PC) Only
- Licensure Costs Covered: The agency will now cover licensure and recertification costs for MHT employees required to maintain QMHA certification.
Oregon Youth Authority (OYA)
- Promotion: Same improvements as OSH/PC—interview notes and scoring available upon request, plus advice and coaching from HR.
- Vacation Bidding: Clear and concise language now reflects the current practice for vacation bidding.
- Hardship Transfers: We’ve added contract language that reflects the current hardship transfer policy to provide clarity and enforceability.
- Continuing Education: Same clarification on $1,000 reimbursement for qualifying classifications as OSH/PC.
- Labor/Management Engagement: Policies and procedures will now be reviewed and discussed during Labor/Management meetings. Employees whose regular schedules conflict with committee meetings may request to temporarily modify their work schedule pursuant to Article 90--18 - Work Schedules.
We’re back at the table Tuesday, June 17th, continuing to work through important proposals—including our proposed differentials to address the unique hazards and challenges faced by our members.
5/30
The Institutions Coalition did not bargain this week due to some team members being unavailable.
5/16
On Tuesday, May 13, your bargaining team met with management to continue negotiations. We passed several proposals back and forth and are pleased to report that we’re making progress on many issues. However, there are still key areas where we remain far apart. Here's a breakdown of where things currently stand by agency:
Across All Agencies (OSH, OYA, PC)
- Labor-Management Committees (LMC): Management agreed that agency policies and procedures will be vetted through LMC. Members who sit on the committee will be able to flex their schedules if a meeting falls on their day off.
- Promotion Feedback: Management agreed to provide interview notes and scoring upon request when a member is denied a promotion. Additionally, HR will offer coaching and interview advice.
- Differentials: Management rejected the differential proposals for Food & Nutrition Services (FNS) workers who supervise patients or youth.
Oregon Youth Authority (OYA)
- Vacation Bidding: Management accepted our vacation bidding language, which was developed collaboratively through LMC.
- Promotions: We continue to push for stronger promotion language at OYA to prioritize internal candidates.
- Critical Need Incentive (CNI): Management has proposed to eliminate the CNI at OYA entirely, effective July 1. We are pushing back on this and remain in active negotiations.
- Hazardous Workplace Differential: Management rejected our proposal to provide a differential for those working in specialized management units.
Oregon State Hospital (OSH)
- Boots/Uniforms: Management agreed to include Vocational Services workers assigned to the woodshop, greenhouse, and landscaping crews to the boots/uniforms language. They also agreed to increase the boots reimbursement for Facilities to $200 per biennium and for EVS, Voc Services, Materials Management, to be increased to $150 per biennium. Additionally, they agreed to increase the protective eyewear reimbursement by $25.
- Remote Work for 12-Hour Staff: Our proposal to allow 12-hour shift workers to complete 4 hours of their shift remotely was rejected. Discussions are ongoing.
- CNI Proposal: Management wants to require zero unscheduled absences in the 14 days prior to receiving a CNI. We continue to push back on this restriction.
- Differentials: Our proposals for clerical staff working within the secure perimeter and Activity Coordinators performing Peer Support duties were also rejected. We are still in discussions on these as well as the differential for the PICU.
Pendleton Cottage (PC)
- Licensure & Recertification Fees: Management agreed to cover QMHA licensure and recertification fees to MHTs required to hold this certification.
- Custodian Differential: Custodians will now be added to the differential language of 10% for parity with OSH.
5/2
Your bargaining team met with management on April 29 and responded to their 4/18 package with one of our own. Here's what this package proposal included organized by agency:
All Agencies
- Investigatory notices from HR should include the reason, date, time, and location of the event being investigated.
- Labor-Management Committees should regularly review policies and procedures to identify problems early.
- Employees who are passed over for promotion should be able to request their interview notes and scoring.
- We’re continuing to push for stronger oversight of investigations and discipline to track patterns and ensure fairness.
Oregon State Hospital (OSH) and Pendleton Cottage
- We agreed to the $10.00 meal penalty payment but continue to push for real meals from Kirkbride and Valley Cafes instead of freezer-burnt TV dinners, we also shared photos of the TV dinner freezer-burnt meals and the unsafe food storage (freezer being held shut with a lanyard) to back this up.
- We countered that if an employee is mandated, they should receive an email confirmation and the penalty payment form.
- We’re also continuing to push for dieticians to be included in the Continuing Education reimbursement LOA.
- We did get agreement that during vacation scheduling seniority can be utilized once per year instead of once every two years.
Oregon Youth Authority (OYA)
- We proposed that internal candidates be considered before external applicants for promotions.
Management gave us another package proposal, but they rejected all of the differentials we have proposed. They did counter with a $25 increase to protective eyewear but rejected any increases to boots/uniforms. Their package included agreement to cover QMHA recertification costs at Pendleton Cottage and added language at OYA to limit emergency reassignments across classifications. They refused to increase the 15-minute computer access time, but added language for OSH only that would ensure enough time is scheduled for required trainings and reviews in Workday.
4/18
The coalition bargaining team met with management on April 15, 2025. At this session, management passed a package proposal responding to several of our proposals.
Management's counter proposals are as follows:
- Promotional language at OYA - Management agreed to adding promotional language for OYA. While management did reject our proposal to require internal consideration before external posting, management proposed that all postings be open, competitive and current employees who meet the minimum qualifications will be guaranteed an interview and full consideration.
- For all agencies within the Institutions coalition - Management agreed to provide interview notes and scoring to employees who are not selected for promotion. HR will make interview coaching and advice available upon request, though they rejected our proposal for structured career advancement training.
- Vacation Scheduling at OSH and Pendleton Cottage - We proposed allowing employees to exercise vacation scheduling seniority three times every two calendar years (an increase from once every two years). Management countered with allowing it once per calendar year.
- Labor Management Committee Participation - Management agreed that LMC members may request to temporarily modify their schedule when an LMC meeting falls on their day off.
- Mandate and Meal Penalties - Management rejected our proposal to increase penalty pay for mandates but countered with an increase to meal penalty payments. They also rejected our proposal to provide meals from on-site cafés during extended shifts.
We tentatively agreed to a proposal for OSH and Pendleton Cottage which provides that effective November 1st of each year, any compensatory time exceeding 60 hours will be automatically cashed out. This eliminates the need for employees to request to carry over the allowed 60 hours into the next year. However, if an employee wishes to cash out any portion of the 60-hour balance, they can initiate that request.
We continue to push for improvements that recognize the value of your work and time. The next session is scheduled for April 29th, and we’ll keep you informed every step of the way.
4/4
We met with management on Tuesday, April 1st for bargaining. This was the final meeting to introduce new proposals, and we passed a total of 13 proposals.
Our first applies to all workers across the coalition and recognizes the critical role they play, especially when required to report in person while others work remotely. In these situations, we propose employees receive time-and-a-half for all hours worked, in exchange for waiving the current $3.00/hour essential worker differential.
At Oregon State Hospital, we proposed several improvements. Employees under investigation could choose to receive questions in writing and submit written responses in advance, giving the employer flexibility to continue the process or accept the written statement as final. We also proposed extending computer access time from 15 to 30 minutes. Additional proposals include a 5% differential for Office Specialist 2s with regular client contact, and a 10% differential for Food Service Workers and Cooks supervising clients. We also called for increased allowances for protective eyewear and boots, and expanding boot coverage to Vocational Services. A differential was also proposed for Activity Coordinators who hold Peer Support Specialist or Traditional Health Worker certifications, recognizing their added responsibilities.
For Pendleton Cottage, we proposed a 5% differential for Mental Health Therapists required to maintain QMHA certification, along with reimbursement for recertification and continuing education costs.
At Oregon Youth Authority, proposals include ensuring staff are not reassigned outside their classification and that mandatory overtime stays within classification—while still allowing voluntary cross-classification overtime. We also proposed increases to penalty pay and meal reimbursements to reflect inflation, a compensatory time cap increase from 80 to 200 hours (matching OSH), and a 10% differential for employees working in Specialized Management Units. Lastly, we proposed clear timelines and collaborative procedures for vacation bidding and request approvals.
Management proposed 12 hour shifts at OSH, a very small differential for those assigned to the PICU, eliminating the OYA Critical Need Incentive and added an expectation for the OSH Critical Needs Incentive that employees must have worked all of their regularly scheduled hours (except for prescheduled paid time off or approved bereavement leave) in the 14 days prior to working a CNI shift to be eligible.
3/21
The institutions coalition bargaining team did not meet with management this past week. Both teams spent time preparing to pass proposals, so they are ready for the last bargaining session before the deadline, which is on April 1.
3/4
During this session, we put forward proposals aimed at improving working conditions, financial fairness, and career advancement opportunities for our members.
Here’s what we proposed:
-
- Article 32.2 to increase the penalty pay, and penalty meal reimbursement as well as clarified that provided meals would come from the institution’s cafe.
- We passed proposals on Article 45.2 to create language that when denied a promotion, the notes and scoring of the interview will be provided upon request, and that HR will provide advice and coaching on interview skills and other appropriate trainings to improve the member's ability to promote in all facilities or institutions, as well as adding hardship transfer committee language for the Oregon Youth Authority.
2/21
This week marked our first coalition bargaining meetings with management. The State of Oregon workforce is divided up into four coalitions: Human Services, Institutions, ODOT and Special Agencies. We also negotiate at Central Table, where language that impacts everyone (including pay increases) is bargained. We will hold our first meeting at Central Table on Thursday, February 27th at 1:30pm.
At the Institutions table we made an opening statement highlighting the challenges workers face every day working in this coalition. We passed proposals around more transparency to increase notification around policy changes, investigations and discipline. We also made a proposal to increase how often seniority could be used in a year at OSH and Pendleton Cottage.
Management proposed that comp time exceeding 60 hours will be automatically cashed out during the annual period, eliminating the requirement to provide hard copies of disciplines, and GLCs at OYA having the ability to bid on shift assignments immediately upon hire vs. waiting to pass trial service.
Share Your Story!
Use this recording software to share a short video directly from your device. We want to hear from our members and share those messages with the State of Oregon and the public to make sure we have a successful bargaining campaign. If we like your story we may reach out for more information or to invite you to join our Storytellers’ Bureau. Please fill out the release at this link if you record a video that we can use.
If you consider yourself a good speaker, a passionate story teller or you just know you could get the point across go ahead and apply to be a member of our Storyteller’s Bureau!
Tell Your StoryJoin The Contract Action TeamDigital Toolkit
What is mediation and Why do we do it?
Our bargaining teams request mediation for a number of different reasons depending on what is happening in that bargaining campaign. Often, we request mediation as soon as possible to keep our future options open. The Public Employee Collective Bargaining Act (PECBA) outlines a timeline for our bargaining processes – it dictates how long we have to bargain before we can request mediation, how long we have to be in mediation, etc. before we can utilize options like a strike or binding arbitration. So, in many campaign cycles we request mediation before we really need it to keep moving our timeline forward. Sometimes, we request mediation because we know that the mediator’s work will be essential to settling the contract.
So, what is mediation? Mediation is a process in which a mediator joins the two bargaining teams in their bargaining sessions to work with both teams in reaching an agreement. The work of the mediator can happen in different ways – sometimes the mediator will shuttle messages back and forth between the teams. Sometimes the mediator will facilitate conversations between the two teams. The hope is that by having the mediator work with the teams that they are able to explore new options and/or have different conversations than they have been so that they can reach a settlement.
Memory Lane – Let’s remember the contract fight from 2023!
Meet the Central Table Bargaining Team!
- Chairs: Angela Ward (ODFW) & Joe Dyer (Pendleton Cottage)
- Ibrahim Coulibaly (BOLI)
- Ritchie Maes (ODOT)
- Austin Folnagy (Employment Department)
- Jesse Rodriguez (OSH)
- Jordan Meyer (ODHS)
- Rachelle Mullins (ODHS)
- Tracy Thompson (DCBS)
- Sarah Heinsohn (OPRD)
Feel free to contact them here: stateworkerbargaining@seiu503.org
2025 State Coalition Tables Bargaining Delegates
The State of Oregon contract is divided into 4 coalitions based on agencies doing similar work. Here are the elected bargaining delegates representing their agencies at the coalition bargaining tables.Human Services | ODOT | Specials | Institutions |
---|---|---|---|
Em Johnson - DHS | Tash Wilson - ODA | Thomas Prislac - DOR | Joseph Dyer - OHA |
Rachelle Mullins - DHS | Vaughn Balzer - ODOT | Tamera Combs - DOR | Debbie Shook - OYA |
Tylor Carney - DHS | Lee Erickson - ODOT | Thorsten Geissler - DOR | Benjamin Moul - OYA |
Joshua May - DHS | Phil Smith - ODOT | Lynette Jacobs - DOR | Tim VonSeggern - OYA |
Jordan Meyer - DHS | Ritchie Maes - ODOT | Kathy Lamar - DOJ | Jesse Rodriguez - OSH |
Makensi Reyes - DHS | Lon Stockebrand - ODOT | Jasmine Snyder - DOJ | Shawn Holliday - OSH |
Jennifer McGarvin - OHA | Jason Lawrence - ODOT | Wanda Martinez - DOJ | Wendy VonSeggern - OSH |
Chelsea Alionar - OHA | Kelly Lawrence - ODFW | Aunika Lawrence - DOJ | Scott Walliman - OSH |
Janet Rosen - DHS | Angela Ward - ODFW | Paulita Peña Urenda - ODE | Andrew Manibusan - OSH |
Tia Sanchez - OED | Michelle Jones - ODFW | Travis Moore - ODE | Randall Davis - OSH |
Austin Folnagy - OED | Michelle Godin - DMV | Andrew Milne - ODE | Jennifer Cash - OSH |
Matt DeRosa - OED | Peggy Howard - DMV | James Horton - TSPC | Timothy Warren - OSH |
Aidan Kolar - OED | Aisha Young - ODA | Noelle Scott - DAS | |
Kathleen Olson - OED | Norma Verley - DMV | Andy Townsend - OHCS | |
Joellen Billington - DHS | Daniel Mears - DMV | Sarah Mentzer - OHCS | |
Justin Dreyer - DHS | Michael Williams - ODA | Jeni Hall Peel - DAS | |
Martin Ramirez - DHS | Austin Leep - OWRD | Elaine Schacher - DAS | |
Roberto Perez Benitez - OED | Arla Davis - OWRD | William McLaughlin - ODVA | |
Tauni Penner - DHS | Sarah Heinsohn - OPRD | Tracy Thompson - DCBS | |
Kristine Walker - DHS | Jennifer Burnett - OPRD | Khadija Mostafa - DCBS | |
Victor Rios - DHS | Elika Paki - OPRD | David Mohrman - DCBS | |
Matthew Goolsby - ODF | Jerry Curry - OSL | ||
David Showalter - ODF | Tyler Bernstein - Treasury | ||
Megan Frizzel - ODF | April Hergert - HECC | ||
Michele Huffman - ODF | Stephanie Solomon - HECC | ||
Ibrahim Coulibaly - BOLI | |||
Alicia Cowan - BOP | |||
Kimberly Johnson - PERS | |||
Susan Kay Mundell - PERS | |||
Orion Lumiere - OCB |