
Breaking News: State Contract Ratified!
The votes have been tallied, and the 2025 – 2027 state contract is now ratified with 86% of state members casting a ballot in support of the tentative agreement.
Together, we won a contract with great cost of living adjustments, benefits, and working conditions. Here are the highlights:
- Wage Increases: COLAs totaling more than 6.5% – including 2.5% in February 2026 and 4% in January of 2027.
- Steps: We keep our steps, and a new 11th step begins early in 2027. Topped out long-term employees (10+ years) will move into the new top step immediately in February of 2027.
- Healthcare: Maintained access to affordable coverage and protections for workers on 1% premium-share plans.
- Safety and Workload: We fought for, kept and strengthened protections against discrimination in our contracts, expanded access to critical incident leave, and won new safeguards on workload prioritization.
- 21st Century Workplace: Won a remote work appeals process, increased inclement weather leave bank, and secured protections in the transition to biweekly pay in 2027 (including a $1700 payment and additional leave that can be cashed out).
- Stronger Union Rights: More paid union leave, a bigger bargaining team, and improved notification rights around new technology use by the state.
These wins are made possible because we have strength in numbers and can fight for great contracts at the bargaining table. Every action you took, purpling up on Wednesdays, showing up to info pickets, making phone calls and sending emails to decision makers made a difference.
Here is a copy of the Settlement Summary.
Use this calculator to see what your pay will look like (cumulatively) in biweekly pay in 2027 – click here to input your information.
Breaking News: State Contract Ratified!
The votes have been tallied, and the 2025 – 2027 state contract is now ratified with 86% of state members casting a ballot in support of the tentative agreement.
Together, we won a contract with great cost of living adjustments, benefits, and working conditions. Here are the highlights:
- Wage Increases: COLAs totaling more than 6.5% – including 2.5% in February 2026 and 4% in January of 2027.
- Steps: We keep our steps, and a new 11th step begins early in 2027. Topped out long-term employees (10+ years) will move into the new top step immediately in February of 2027.
- Healthcare: Maintained access to affordable coverage and protections for workers on 1% premium-share plans.
- Safety and Workload: We fought for, kept and strengthened protections against discrimination in our contracts, expanded access to critical incident leave, and won new safeguards on workload prioritization.
- 21st Century Workplace: Won a remote work appeals process, increased inclement weather leave bank, and secured protections in the transition to biweekly pay in 2027 (including a $1700 payment and additional leave that can be cashed out).
- Stronger Union Rights: More paid union leave, a bigger bargaining team, and improved notification rights around new technology use by the state.
These wins are made possible because we have strength in numbers and can fight for great contracts at the bargaining table. Every action you took, purpling up on Wednesdays, showing up to info pickets, making phone calls and sending emails to decision makers made a difference.
Here is a copy of the Settlement Summary.
Use this calculator to see what your pay will look like (cumulatively) in biweekly pay in 2027 – click here to input your information.
TBD
Español - Русский - Tiếng Việt
8/1
Your Central Table Bargaining Team has reached a Tentative Agreement with state management—thanks to the strength, unity, and actions of members like you from across Oregon.
After months of negotiations—including long hours in the final days of bargaining, plus last week’s marathon sessions—your elected bargaining team secured a contract early this morning at 5:21am that provides meaningful improvements in wages, benefits, equity, and job security.
This victory wasn’t just won at the table—it was won by YOU. Every action we took together—purpling up on the job, showing up at rallies and informational pickets, contacting decision makers by phone and email—made a difference and helped win this agreement.
Here are the highlights:
Economic Justice
- COLAs totaling more than 6.5% over the life of the contract
- This will include a 2.5% COLA on 2/1/26 and 4% on 1/1/27
- Steps: Non-topped out workers will get steps as scheduled (yes, we have to bargain this) and a new (11th) top step on 2/1/27. Employees who have been with the state for 10 years and are topped out will receive their new step immediately on that date
- Health Insurance: Maintained access to affordable healthcare for the life of the contract; language that protects 1% premium share plans in the face of rising healthcare costs
- Differentials
- Essential Worker Differential increased to $4/hour
- Study on Fire Incident Management Team
- Process to bargain differential for ODHS investigation in residences
Safety and Workload
- We fought back and won against management takeaways on the discrimination process
- Safety assessment for workers who are facing harm when filing discrimination and professionalism complaints
- If requested, managers must meet with staff that make workload prioritization requests
- Increased access to critical incident leave for traumatic incidents on the job
- Creation of a committee that will determine best practices and make recommendations for a policy on Employee Resource Groups
21st Century Workplace
- New remote work appeals process that allows workers to appeal remote work denials or recensions to a labor management committee
- Inclement weather leave expanded by 16 hours per biennium
- Non-essential workers get essential worker differentials when required to report in person during a closure
- Extended bargaining process to come to an agreement on an LOA on AI implementation to September 2025
- A committee to review the layoff language in the contract and recommend improvements
A Strong Union
- Extends 12 hours of paid leave - previously only available to stewards - to sublocal officers as well.
- Increases size of Central Table team from 10 to 12 members
- Required notice to the union when management submits reclassification request
Payroll Transition
- Transition to biweekly pay in July of 2027
- $1700 one-time payment in July of 2027, plus
- 40 hours of leave granted 90 days prior to payroll transition that can be cashed out for transition costs
- A Joint Labor Management Advisory Committee will meet to discuss and make recommendations for the transition
- Commitments on:
- No change in FTE status because of the transition
- Management is responsible for approving timesheets and ensuring workers are paid, even when time is not submitted or approved on schedule.
- Improved training on Workday payroll for represented employees and required training for management on time approval.
- Beginning January 2026, overpayments can only be recouped going back 364 days. All overpayments qualify for a repayment plan regardless of how the overpayment was issued
- Rapid response process in place on payroll errors when transition occurs to ensure issues are handled immediately
...and much more!
What’s Next?
This agreement is tentative until members vote to ratify. Members will receive a full summary of the agreement when they vote. In the coming days, we’ll send:
• Information on ratification meetings and Q&A sessions
• Voting instructions and deadlines
Together, we made this happen. Let’s finish strong—review the TA, attend a session, and cast your vote!
7/23
The Central Table Bargaining Team spent the first two days of this week negotiating with management on a lot of key priorities and made a lot of progress! We had major wins on our remote work article and inclement weather.
- On remote work we have created a panel that includes our union being able to respond to remote work grievances, so now workers will have a voice in that process
- On inclement weather, we increased the amount of inclement weather leave from 40 to 56 hours—the first increase we have won since the language was initially won.
Neither side passed updated economics, but we do expect more conversations on economics early next week. Management heard us when we told them to do better on payroll. They made a lot of changes in response to the concerns we shared last week. Specifically, they made these moves:
- They are now addressing the gap created through the biweekly payroll transition by giving workers 40 additional hours of vacation that they can cash out to help cover expenses AND a one-time $1,500 payment. This compensation will cover the transition gap for most workers, which we have stated needs to happen. This is a ton of movement from their initial $500.
- They have increased the specificity of what will be done leading up to the transition to assure mistakes will not happen.
We communicated that they still have a long way to go to assure our team that they can implement this transition successfully and that the process needs to be thought out and transparent. We are looking forward to seeing what they show us when we meet next week. We also need to hear from you about this issue. Tomorrow, we will be launching one more survey on this proposal. Be on the lookout for that! Here are the highlights of the tentative agreements we reached:
- Article 138 – Working Remotely: As mentioned above, we have made a lot of progress here!
-
- We have bargained a new appeals process for denials and rescissions. Appeals will be heard by a committee that is made up of one union representative and one LRU representative. This will give workers a new pathway, once the grievance process is exhausted, to address remote work issues.
- We’ve added language stating that when management is considering if someone is eligible for remote work, ad hoc in-person meetings, trainings, or other such requirements cannot be the sole reason for determining that someone is not eligible.
- Out-of-state employees must receive at least 30 days' notice of a rescission of their remote work request.
- Article 123 – Inclement and Hazardous Conditions: We were able to win a couple of important pieces of language in this article.
-
- DAS will publish the factors that they utilized to make closure decisions. We fought hard on this issue to lift up the disparate treatment that rural workers have communicated. We believe this change will give more clarity for those workers about why offices remain open during inclement and hazardous conditions.
- We’ve increased the number of hours available for people to use from 40 to 56!
- Equity and Discrimination - We discussed with management how to better structure a committee that we won in bargaining two years ago. This committee receives data from the state that helps it understand any trends around promotions, disciplines, separations, and complaints as they are connected to protected classes. We want to continue the work that this committee started but are exploring if a different make-up of the committee might have a bigger impact on the work it is doing.
- Article 70 – Layoff: We agreed to a joint committee with management to review and improve the layoff contract language. This committee will also review available resources for employees during the layoff process and make recommendations for improvements to those resources.
- Article 71 – Seasonal and Intermittent Employees: This is another place where we were in agreement with the state that the language in the article is in need of review. We are forming a joint committee that will include representatives from all the agencies that utilize seasonal employees to review both the current contract language and agency processes. This committee will make recommendations for improvements to both of these things.
7/17
Last week, state workers took action in dozens of cities around Oregon. SEIU 503 members came together and demanded that management do better at the bargaining table and meet workers needs on a new top step, better COLAs and maintaining discrimination language in the contract. It was clear in bargaining this week that these actions had a HUGE impact as we saw more movement from management than we have seen all year. Because of this A LOT happened at the bargaining table this week. Here is a breakdown of the biggest priorities:
At this point in bargaining, it is about what money the Legislature has approved for the next two years. They approved $300 million—the second highest ever—but it still limits what we can achieve. With the changing economy and shifting federal policies, the budget will continue to fluctuate, aligning state and union priorities more closely. For example, the state delayed the top step in the contract to save money, but they knew we wouldn’t settle without it.
COLAs – Both sides made movement on COLAs, and we are getting closer to an agreement. On Tuesday management proposed a 2.5% increase on 12/1/2025 and 3.45% on 12/1/2026. Again, this was only because of the action workers took on July 10th. On Wednesday, we updated our COLA proposal to a CPI (with a minimum of 2% and a maximum of 3.5%) on 11/1/2025 and CPI+2% (with a minimum of 3% and a maximum of 4.5%) on 11/1/2026. We continue to push management on the concept of attaching COLAs to inflation to better assure workers do not fall behind again in the future.
Management made MAJOR moves on three proposals:
- Top Step – Management proposed an eleventh step added on 3/1/2027 that people would get on their benefit eligibility date. We want to be clear, this movement happened because workers fought hard for it. Management has clearly not wanted to add an additional step during this contract, and the souring economic forecast made this fight so much harder. This is a huge win for workers. Yesterday our team countered with an eleventh step added on 11/1/2026 that all topped out people would get on that date.
- Discrimination – For months management has been trying to remove discrimination protections from the contract. Yesterday, we received a package back from the State that includes many of the proposals that impact equity, and the State made big movement. They said that they heard us when we said changes to the equity protections in the contract are unacceptable, and in the package, withdrew most of their proposed changes to the articles of the contract that impact equity and discrimination (Articles 22, 22T, 101, 101T). They are also proposing to move the equity steward language into our Union Rights article where the majority of the steward language exists. We were happy to see this movement, and we know it only happened because WORKERS TOOK ACTION. Management moved because of the stories that you shared. They heard us loud and clear; we MUST have discrimination protections in our contract.
- Remote Work – We have started to dig into the issues that we hear from workers – mainly that decisions about remote work agreements are not consistent across agencies, much less across the state. In addition, we never win grievances at Step 3, which means we cannot hold agencies accountable for their decisions. Yesterday, we were finally able to make some progress with management (who, thus far, has refused to make any changes to Article 138). In the back and forth we had yesterday, they agreed to take the decision making at Step 3 out of the hands of management alone and put it into the hands of a joint labor management panel. They also agreed to include language that talks about partial rescissions of remote work alongside full recissions. This article has not been TA’d as of now, but this was big progress that we think will have a substantial impact on our ability to hold management accountable on remote work issues.
We also continued to negotiate over other important concepts where we saw less movement:
- Health Insurance – They continue to propose using the same language that we currently have in our contract establishing premium shares. We did have a conversation with them that included a PEBB board member to explain our concerns with the current language. We hope that we will see movement in a future proposal from them.
- Inclement Weather – This proposal is packaged with Remote work; we are still having conversations about this article but were able to get the state to agree that workers should be able to find the criteria that are being used to determine closures.
- Wage Parity and Vacation – We continue to propose that workers should have the same pay as management service employees when they are in the same classification. The state has still not responded to this proposal, which is extremely disappointing. We are also proposing that represented workers should have the same vacation accrual rate as management services. The state continues to refuse to agree to this proposal, but we have not moved off of it.
Payroll
The State also passed us a counter on payroll on Tuesday. It was disappointing and completely missed the mark. They continue to connect payroll with economics in their payroll proposals. In short, they are telling us that they refuse to settle without payroll changes. Their most recent proposal included a specific timeline but did not include enough money to ensure that workers will not experience economic insecurity during the transition. They included forty hours of additional vacation leave that could be cashed out immediately to help with the payroll transition, which is not enough to cover the transition period but is better than their initial proposal of a one-time $500 payment. We had a long sidebar discussion with them about what we need from them to consider making this transition and will see what their response is when we meet again next week.
State workers also received notice of the Workday transition class action lawsuit settlement. We shared a similar update with all members in March so hopefully this was not new to anyone. This notice is a required step to finalize the $15 million dollar lawsuit settlement around the Workday payroll transition. Please note, this settlement is not finalized as it is contingent on labor organization agreements regarding Workday-related grievances. We must reach a settlement during bargaining for this lawsuit settlement to move forward.
7/11
On Thursday, thousands of workers and supporters at more than 60 state worksites across Oregon came together and took action to show management we are serious about winning a fair contract. Rest assured, we’re not going to stop until we get a good deal. Elected union leaders and organizers are working on next steps in our escalation and we’re going to continue needing all our member power to win this! Stay tuned in the coming days and weeks.
In Salem, nearly 200 state workers marched at the Capitol demanding dignity and respect, as well as calling for solidarity for Oregon Department of Transportation workers, who are facing massive departmental layoffs. Our Oregon Strong, Union Strong day of action was an awesome display of worker power! Check out this video of the action.
We know it takes these kinds of actions to get management to move! When we fight, we win!
While we picketed around the state, the bargaining team met with management for a full day session. There was some movement on a few topics, and the team remained steadfast on our most important priorities. See more details below:
Economics – We responded to management’s economic proposal by telling them their proposal was not good enough. We clearly stated that it is unacceptable to hold key economic provisions—such as cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs), step increases, and healthcare—hostage by making them contingent on our agreement to a biweekly pay schedule. We urged them to stop treating our livelihoods as bargaining chips.
We also focused on the lack of a top step in their current economic package. We have heard from members that adding a top step is a key priority this bargaining cycle and with our economic pass we are trying to be clear what it will take to settle this contract.
We also passed an updated economic proposal so management understands our priorities:
- We moved on our COLA proposal, bringing it to CPI + 2.5% retroactive to July 1, 2025 and CPI + 3% on July 1, 2026. This included a minimum COLA of no less than 3% and 4% each year.
- We also proposed adding one new top step, down from our previous proposal of two new top steps. This would include immediate implementation for topped out workers, meaning they would get a raise as soon as the contract is ratified.
- We updated our healthcare proposal but made sure that we protect workers’ access to a 1% premium plan as healthcare costs continue to rise. We continue to highlight to management that without action, 1% premium shares are threatened by higher carrier costs.
Management passed us two package proposals, both of which have been under discussion for some time. They agreed to remove contracting out language from the proposal so we can bargain it separately from other issues we are trying to resolve. We’ve made it clear we reject the current contract language and need to address the growing trend of hiring contractors to replace laid-off workers. Our proposal limits management’s ability to do so.
After bargaining, we met briefly with DAS to raise concerns about the ODOT layoff process—specifically the rushed timeline, lack of worker communication, oversized geographic regions, and contract language not designed for layoffs of this scale. We’re awaiting their response.
We remain committed to securing a contract that reflects the challenges we face. Next week we will be bargaining on Tuesday and Wednesday. We will have a link and times ready for everyone that is able to join on Monday. We also are not done with this fight! We held a great rally and info pickets across the entire state, now it's time to keep the pressure on! We will have updates next week on what our next action will be!
7/3
Yesterday, we finally received an economic counter from management. They passed us an economic package that included no new steps and a small increase to their COLA proposal. They are now proposing 2.65% on December 1, 2025 and 3% on December 1, 2026. They also have continued to propose all economics (healthcare, steps and COLAs) packaged with their payroll changes (biweekly pay, hourly pay and eliminating forecasting). This means their proposed pay increases are contingent on us accepting their payroll proposal.
We understood coming into this session that the economic outlook of the state budget makes this conversation difficult, but we are extremely disappointed with this proposal and management’s unwillingness to move on adding a new top step. This is going to be a fight. We have to turn the pressure up on them. The Oregon Strong, Union Strong Information Pickets on July 10th are more important than ever. For us to move management on a new top step and other priorities like increased layoff protections and maintaining discrimination protections in the workplace we must show up in force at worksite info pickets on Thursday.
RSVP here to let us know which picket you are joining!
We also passed management three other package proposals.
Part of the economic proposal from the State included responses to both our selective salary proposals and our differential proposals. Two out of the six groups that did selective salary presentations were included in their proposal. We will be reaching out to the groups that participated to share feedback from the State on their presentations. We received a no on the majority of the differentials and will be spending some time discussing them as a team next week. However, the State did agree to increase the essential worker differential from $3.00 to $4.00 an hour. They also proposed a path to adding the bilingual and multilingual differential to someone’s pay based on time worked rather than having it be a permanent part of your position description.
Our team passed the State three packages. The first package contained a number of proposals around leave time:
- Article 58 – Holidays - The State has been clear with us each time that we discussed this package that they would not be adding new leave time to our contract in this round of negotiations. We spent some time engaging with caucus leadership to discuss our proposal on adding Indigenous People’s Day. We also went back to our bargaining surveys, which ranked an additional holiday as our lowest economic priority. At the federal level, the day after Thanksgiving has been named Native American Heritage Day. In our proposal we agreed to let go of Indigenous People’s Day, but asked that the day after Thanksgiving be named Native American Heritage Day. Our team wanted to prioritize Indigenous workers, and this is one step forward, but there is more work to do in the future.
- Article 61 – Leaves of Absence without Pay - The other proposal we passed in this package was around leaves of absence without pay and trying to make using LWOP more accessible.
- Vacation was initially included in this package, but we have since removed it.
The second package we passed contained several proposals that are important to our members:
- Article 138 – Working Remotely – We have heard from members about their frustrations with their inability to make any meaningful challenges to remote work decisions. The proposal we passed still includes being able to arbitrate grievances on remote work.
- Article 71 – Seasonal and Intermittent Employees – We agreed to a proposal from management to create a committee that will have representation from every agency that employs seasonal employees. This committee will review both the current contract language and practices at agencies in order to recommend changes for the next bargaining team. While we were hoping to make changes to this article in this round of bargaining, the committee is a big step. Figuring out better language for seasonals is a priority for both teams.
- NEW LOA – Workload – We are continuing to push the idea that we should have workload models for all classifications so that people can understand what their workload should look like and when it is too high.
- Article 123 – Inclement and Hazardous Conditions – Our proposal on inclement weather ensures that people who can use this leave have access to it when they need it without arbitrary limits. It also includes language that more clearly defines who essential workers are.
The final package that we passed contained proposals that focus on emergent issues for our members:
- Article 13 – Contracting Out – We continue to push the idea that if the State has people on their layoff list, they need to hire them back from that list if they are qualified for the work rather than contracting out.
- New LOA Employee Monitoring – In this package, we agreed to management’s proposal that they will notify the union and the sublocal president prior to implementing or modifying any employee monitoring, surveillance, or data collection technology.
Our next bargaining session will be on Thursday. We will be meeting with management as workers all over the state are picketing. We will make sure to share observation links with everyone as we get closer to that date with information on when you can observe bargaining after your picket!
On June 30, the Collective Bargaining Agreement formally expired. Today we agreed to extend the CBA through the last scheduled bargaining session. So, the new expiration date of the CBA is July 23rd.
6/27
The Central Table team met with management Thursday, June 26, joined by more than 100 State workers to tell management we will not agree to remove discrimination protections from our contract. Many State workers shared their experiences with discrimination, emphasizing that a policy alone was not sufficient protection. We let management know we are extremely disappointed they even made this proposal.
We need your help to fight back. Join us at one of our “Oregon Strong, Union Strong” info pickets on July 10th to let management know we want a fair contract that includes respect, COLAs and protection from discrimination on the job.
We then passed them a package that contained our proposals around discrimination. This included:
- Articles 22 and 22T – No Discrimination – Our position on these articles remains unchanged from our initial proposals – we believe that discrimination grievances should be arbitrable and we believe that when someone is experiencing discrimination they should not be asked to continue working in the same space as the person who is discriminating against them.
- Articles 101 and 101T – Safety and Health – After hearing management’s proposal on how they conduct complaint investigations, we did adjust our proposal in this article to reflect what we learned – when they receive a complaint they investigate the behavior and then decide which policy best covers the behaviors they have discovered. We again maintained our language from our initial proposal that requires the State to take action in order to protect the worker from experiencing further harm while the investigation takes place.
- NEW Article: Dignity Clause – We updated our Dignity Clause proposal based on feedback we got from the State. We included the definition of harassment that is included in State policy, which talks about both protected classes and non-protected classes. We also expanded the Dignity Clause to all employees but highlighted that supervisors and managers should be held to a higher standard.
- LOA: Equity and Non-Discrimination Initiative – We included our initial proposal for this LOA in this package, which maintains both the stewards and the committee, with additional information being given to the committee.
- New LOA: Immigration Status – We included our initial proposal on immigration status, which provides paid leave for people to attend to their immigration status if needed.
- New LOA: ERGs – We included our initial proposal that creates a pathway for workers in all agencies to create an ERG (Employee Resource Group) and have standardized practices across the State.
The State gave us two packages yesterday. The team has not had a chance to review these packages yet as we were working on another set of proposals that we will give to the State next week. One of them is a package that has been passed back and forth a couple of times that contains Contracting Out, ADA Accommodations, and our new LOA on Employee Monitoring. The second package is a new one that contains responses to our proposals on Layoff language, the Salary and Benefit report, the State Worker Training Fund, Workplace Designations, the Finalization Process, and Quarterly Check-ins.
6/20
Bargaining this week opened with executive director Melissa Unger making a powerful statement about management’s biweekly pay proposal. She emphasized that workers have arranged their lives around the current pay schedule and are also wary of more changes after the issues caused by the Workday payroll transition. Over the last few bargaining cycles management has consistently proposed payroll changes, including biweekly pay. We let them know that if they are serious about implementing these changes, they need to address workers’ concerns. We refuse to be harmed by another fumbled payroll transition.
We then passed our counter to their payroll proposal. Our proposal incorporates management’s proposal and addresses concerns that we have heard from members over the last few months. Here is what is included in our proposal:
- A joint labor-management steering committee will be created to evaluate Workday’s suitability as the payroll program (and request a new payroll system RFP if the program is deemed unsuited), select a third-party auditor that will evaluate the Workday payroll transition and what went wrong, improve employee training on the payroll program, review and suggest improvements for payroll time entry and paystubs, and more.
- Establishes that time entry is the employer’s responsibility and assures payment even if time is not entered, establishes that overpayments not caused by the worker will not be recouped. and increases training requirements for management on time approval.
- Creates a payroll assistance team that is available by phone to answer questions about business rules and system functionality for payroll that will respond to calls within 24 hours.
- Gives all employees 24 hours of paid time to attend financial counseling provided at no cost to the employee and 16 hours of additional personal business leave that will be available to on January 1, 2027 through December 31, 2027 to attend to personal finances.
- Employees will have the ability to cash out sick leave between January 1, 2027 through December 31, 2027 to assist in any financial needs during this period.
- If an employee experiences tax issues due to the payroll transition, the state shall provide tax support at no cost to the employee.
- The transition would occur in June of 2027
- Employees will be paid for a partial month (June 1, 2027 – June 18, 2027) on July 1, 2027.
- In addition to their partial month pay, employees will also receive a check on July 1, 2027 that is the equivalent of one-hundred and twenty (120) hours of pay for that employee.
- The first biweekly pay period will be from June 19, 2027 to July 2, 2027 and will be paid on July 16, 2027
- Employees will receive a two-thousand dollar ($2000) one-time payment on July 16, 2027.
- The State develops a rapid payroll error response system during the transition. Employees who receive underpayments during this period will have their underpayment rectified immediately.
- The state will choose a test group of non-SEIU-represented employees to run a transition pilot. This pilot will be completed at least three months prior to the transition. The state will share the results of this pilot with the steering committee for review.
Management also passed a package proposal containing the following proposals among others:
- Article 139 – Working Remotely: The State wants to maintain current contract language on remote work, citing that agencies should have flexibility to determine when people work remotely and when they don’t. They have not yet responded to our proposal regarding workplace determinations for remote workers.
- Article 71 – Seasonal and Intermittent Employees: The State rejected our proposal regarding seasonal workers that would provide more stability for these workers. They proposed establishing a committee to review the language in the contract and development recommendations for the next bargaining teams.
- Article 123 – Inclement or Hazardous Conditions: We made some progress on inclement and hazardous conditions language. The State agreed that if a nonessential worker is required to work on a closure day, they will receive essential worker pay. They are still pushing to decrease their notice requirements for closures, moving away from the 5am deadline. They are also refusing to increase leave banks, leaving workers behind like those at the Clackamas County DMV who ran out last winter due to closures.
- New LOA – Workload Model: The State wants us to withdraw our workload LOA. They think a one-size-fits-all approach won’t work for all agencies and that creating one for every individual position would be too time-consuming.
- New LOA – 32 Hour Workweek: They said the union should withdraw our LOA on a 32-hour work week and said legislative changes would be needed to implement this.
We are working on a response to this package.
6/13
This week in bargaining we made movement on some key issues. The first was our economic proposal. We determined now is the right time to move because we are getting more clarity on what is happening federally, and the May revenue forecast came in. It is lower than anticipated and gives a negative outlook for Oregon, suggesting there could be a recession. The team decided to tie the COLA in the first year to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) in this proposal to better reflect what we heard on the bargaining survey. Our proposal to management yesterday was:
- CPI plus 3% on July 1, 2025, but not less than 4% (with the current CPI, this would result in a COLA of about 5.3%)
- CPI plus 4% on July 1, 2026, but not less than 4% (with current CPI, this would result in a COLA of about 6.3%)
We also made movement on our health insurance proposal:
- We moved to status quo on premium share (1% premium share on the lower cost plans and 5% on the higher cost plans). However, we restructured how we talk about those plans in the contract to better reflect the bigger increases we’ve been seeing over the last few years.
- We moved off of our proposal that asked the State to guarantee gender-affirming care. The State flagged to us that this is not something we can bargain over because we are prohibited from bargaining over plan design. Our legal staff agreed with that assessment. Currently there are protections for this care under Oregon State law and our union is committed to protecting that law.
We also passed one package to management yesterday and they passed one package to us.
Our package:
- Article 13 – Contracting Out – We passed back our original proposal that would require the state to hire people back from the layoff list if they are qualified to do work that would be contracted out.
- LOA (Letter of Agreement) on ADA – We reiterated our concerns about the non-specific responses we get in the denials of ADA requests.
- New LOA on Employee Monitoring – We made some changes to our proposal to reflect feedback we heard from the State, but we continued pushing to protect employees from unjust discipline.
- Criminal Background Checks- We agreed to current contract language on criminal background checks after hearing from the State about how hard it is to write language that would work for every agency. We did share with the State that we would like them to have a higher level of transparency when it comes to what will be looked at in the background check so that people can navigate the process better.
Management’s package for us focused on the articles that address leave. Last week we gave management a response to this package, which includes bereavement leave, holidays, leaves without pay, and vacation, among others. This week they gave us a counter.
- Article 66 – Vacation Leave. They removed vacation from this package so that we can have conversations about it separately.
- They included a new LOA on hardship leave that would make it more accessible to people.
- On all other pieces of this package, they did not make any movement.
We have worked with the State to temporarily pause mediation so that we can have people observe our bargaining sessions. We had observers join us this week as we met virtually. Look for an invitation to observe our session next week!
6/6
As we communicated in our last update, we filed for mediation in May. We expected to continue open bargaining during these sessions, but were informed in the morning on Wednesday by our mediator that they do not allow this practice during mediation. Our team was surprised by this and is discussing how best to proceed with that information.
During our session on Thursday morning, we exchanged two packages with management. Our union team gave management a counter proposal on a package that contained a number of proposals related to types of leave. A few highlights from the package are
- Article 55 – Personal Leave Days: We modified our proposal focus solely winning eight additional hours of personal business leave for workers that work fully in person.
- Article 66 – Vacation Leave: We continue to propose that we should accrue vacation at the same rate as management.
- Article 58 – Holidays: We moved off of our proposal to create two new holidays – Transgender Day of Visibility and Indigenous Peoples’ Day. The team believes that there is no path to two new holiday and so removed Transgender Day of Visibility from our proposal to focus on Indigenous People’s Day, which we have been in conversation with management about for a couple of contract cycles now.
- Article 61 – Leaves of Absence without Pay: We continue to propose that being in leave without pay status not impact your leave accruals (sick leave, vacation leave) until you have been in leave without pay status for thirty days in a calendar year.
Management passed a package to our team that included “nos” to a number of our proposals including:
- Article 132 – Background Checks: where we proposed to make the process more transparent and to add protections for people going through the process.
- Article 13 – Contracting Out: where we proposed language to ensure that employees cannot be laid off and then replaced by contractors.
- New LOA – Employee Monitoring: where we proposed that the employer not be able to use the tools they have for managing property (fleet cars, phones) as part of the disciplinary process for employees.
5/23
This week, we reached a tentative agreement on a package of proposals that included some wins for union rights. We also fought off a bad proposal on required reporting for policy violations on the Contract Specialist program.
One of the most concerning proposals from management during this round of negotiations is their proposal to remove all discrimination protections from the contract. Our team asked management to speak to this proposal to better explain their intent. Management gave a presentation on the Department of Administrative Services (DAS) internal investigation unit and their investigation process. The presentation only reinforced what we already knew: workers need discrimination protections in their collective bargaining agreement!
Management’s process lacks transparency, accountability and trauma-informed practices. Management’s attempt to cut discrimination protections from the contract is unacceptable.
More details on this week’s session are on our website – click here to get up to speed.
The rest of negotiations this week focused on two package proposals
We continued to negotiate on the package management proposed two weeks ago and ultimately reached a tentative agreement on this package. Included in this package:
- Two new seats added to the central table bargaining team to increase member involvement in bargaining
- Paid prep time for Labor Management Committee (LMC) prep meetings
- Rejected management’s proposal requiring the union to tattle on Contract Specialists on state policy violation.
- The Union withdrew its proposal on truncated names recognizing that this work might be better done at individual agency LMCs.
- We also agreed to remove the AI proposal from the package so that it could be negotiated separately.
We’re currently reviewing management’s second package, which includes a proposal to allow workers to talk with recruiters on paid time. The rest focuses on leave proposals, and we’ll have more to report after the next bargaining session.
5/9
We received a package proposal from the State that included our Contract Specialist LOA, our Negotiations Procedures article, and our Labor-Management Committee article among others. The team will be working through their package proposal as, like most package proposals, it contains some things that we like (increasing the size of our central table bargaining team from ten to twelve) and some things that we don’t like a no on our name truncation proposal.
Over the last week our bargaining team has traveled around the state to give updates and have discussions with members about bargaining. The team visited nearly 100 worksites and had conversations with hundreds of workers about what their priorities were and what they hope to see in a new contract.
During the roadshow, the team heard that COLAs, health care and new Steps continue to be high priorities. Currently management has nothing on the table regarding a new top step and we heard loud and clear that we need a new top step that recognizes the years many state workers have put in—in order to win this, we are going to have to ramp up pressure on the state.
We also heard that folks are watching the unknowns in the budget and federal cuts closely, worried about their own jobs and their co-workers, which is why we think working on our layoff language is so important.
We also heard lots of feedback about management’s payroll proposal, and we know management’s current proposal is not acceptable to members. It's clear that if we are going to engage in a conversation about payroll, the state will need to commit to:
- No cut in our pay
- Workers can pay their bills
- Keeping our pay whole during any transition -- $500 is not nearly enough
- No cuts in hours
- Deductions spread out evenly on our paychecks
- Support to transition our bills to a new schedule
- Payroll system that doesn’t make mistakes
- Penalty pay when things go wrong
- Overtime to needs be taxed in a more standard way
Management continues to slowly build their payroll proposal, while we are asking question, we don’t believe they will create a proposal that works for us. But we want to see if we can build a system that will fix long-standing payroll problems and build in more protections for any future errors. That is why we will continue to engage members to identify our vision for a payroll system that works for frontline workers. Please keep your eyes open for future opportunities to participate in those discussions.
This week, we bargained with management for most of the day on Thursday. We were able to reach tentative agreements on three different articles. For two of the articles (Article 1 – Parties to the Agreement and Article 2 – Recognition) the changes were minor changes to update the names of some of the agencies. Our third tentative agreement was on Article 64 – Pre-Retirement Counseling Leave – again, we did not make major changes, but updated the language to include OPSRP and bring it into alignment with current practices.
4/25
This week in bargaining, we reached our first two tentative agreements (TA)! We were able to agree on a proposal that would allow SEIU-represented temporary employees to be considered as internal candidates when applying for positions with any State agency. And management agreed to a proposal that we passed to form a subcommittee with two representatives from each bargaining team to revamp the grievance form and bring it into the 21st century!
We started a conversation between the teams about personnel files to try to get a clear understanding of what a personnel file is within Workday and who has access to it. This is a conversation that we will be continuing in our upcoming bargaining sessions.
Thirteen different SEIU-represented classifications gave presentations to the bargaining teams this week to increase the salary range at which their classification is paid. Representatives from these classifications joined training sessions earlier this year to learn how to most effectively give these presentations. A lot of work goes into them, and we expect to get responses from the State’s team in a few weeks after they have had a chance to review the information.
Next week, we, the bargaining team, are hitting the road to travel around the state to visit dozens of worksites to update members about the bargaining campaign. We will be visiting nearly 100 worksites in every corner of the state between May 1st and May 7th. Though we would love to visit every worksite, we just won’t be able to make that happen. So, we are scheduling some regional off-site meetings so everyone can get updates even if we cannot go to your site. Please register for one of the offsite meetings below and join us if you can:
- Virtual Bargaining Team Roadshow Meeting- Saturday 5/3 at 10am
- Portland Bargaining Team Roadshow Meeting - Thursday, 5/1, at 6:00pm
- Medford Bargaining Team Roadshow Meeting - Saturday, 5/3, at 1:00pm
- McMinnville Bargaining Team Roadshow Meeting - Sunday, 5/4, at 5:00pm
- Eugene Bargaining Team Roadshow Meeting - Sunday, 5/4, at 2:00pm
- Pendleton Bargaining Team Roadshow Meeting - Monday, 5/5, at 6:30pm
We have gathered nearly 10,000 petition signatures so far during this campaign. These signatures have a huge impact because it shows us that you have our back on the important proposals that we have passed like COLAs, Healthcare and Workload and Safety. The petition closes on May 2nd, so you are running out of time to sign if you have not. Please click on this link, read the petition and add your name. Show management we are united and ready to fight!
We also are getting ready for our next action. On Thursday, June 5th we are holding a rally at the Oregon Capitol from 12:00pm - 2:00pm to fight for a state budget that reflects Oregon's values and allows us to get the money needed to pay for a fair contract. Oregonians depend on state services to make ends meet, to care for and educate children, to maintain affordable and quality healthcare and so much more. State workers provide those services and need a fair contract to continue to do that work! Register here today.
Last week we highlighted the proposed rate increases that health insurance carriers (Providence, Kaiser, and Moda) have proposed to the Public Employee Benefits Board. These increases would result in cuts to benefits that will harm employees and their families. We are pushing back and telling these companies to not price gouge at the expense of our benefits. Hundreds of workers have taken action and emailed the decision makers at Providence, Moda, and Kaiser to encourage them to reduce their proposed increases. Click here to join and tell these companies to back off!
4/11
We met with management on Wednesday, 4/9, which was the last day for each side to pass initial proposals. Now that all the proposals are out on the table, the stakes are clear. While our union bargaining team is fighting for members’ priorities including cost-of-living increases, reasonable workloads, employee safety, layoff protections and more, management is proposing serious takeaways, including removing non-discrimination protections from our union contract.
Non-discrimination
While we passed a series of proposals to increase support for our coworkers who are facing discrimination, management took the opposite tack and proposed reducing state workers’ access to union representation when they are discriminated against.
Management’s proposal included crossing out all of the language in our non-discrimination article (Article 22) and replacing it with a vague reference to employer policy. In addition, management’s proposal completely removes all rights for workers to choose union representation when dealing with discrimination. They also proposed removing all of the additional protections we bargained in our last contract for workers experiencing discrimination and harassment at work.
In contrast, our proposals included adding teeth to the non-discrimination language in our contract by making it so a neutral, third-party arbitrator could enforce it. We also proposed additional protections for workers who file non-discrimination grievances or workplace professionalism complaints.
It's clear that we are very far apart on this issue. 44% of workers who participated in our bargaining survey said they have experienced harm in the workplace because of their identity. We find it extremely concerning that the state is proposing to take away protections from those workers and to remove our Union’s ability to support them.
Workload Protections
We proposed these concepts on workload:
- A new Letter of Agreement that creates a standard process and timeline to create Workload Models for all classifications in all agencies that includes input from Labor Management Committees.
- Article 86 – Workload Prioritization: Increases specificity on how management responds and supports someone who makes a prioritization request.
- Article 34 – Standby Duty & On-Call Duty: Updates compensation for on-call pay to 1 hour of pay for each 3 hours of on-call.
- 32-hour work week: We proposed that the State develop a pilot program for a 32-hour work week with no reduction in compensation.
Employee Safety
We proposed these concepts on safety:
- Article 133 – Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking or Human Trafficking Victim Leave: Removes requirement for exhaustion of all forms of paid leave prior to use. Records under this article are confidential. Notice provided to victims if perpetrator is returned to work.
- We also proposed two new letters of agreement to protect people’s identity. One would ensure that people do not need to use their full names unless legally necessary for State business. The other would prevent the State from sharing worker’s pronouns in information requests from outside the state.
Economic Justice
In addition to the COLA and healthcare proposals we gave management in an earlier session, we also passed the following economic pieces:
- Differentials: We passed many changes including an increase to the shift differential and a change to the Essential Worker differential that would allow non-essential workers to receive it if they are required to work on an inclement weather/hazardous conditions leave day.
- Housing: This new letter of agreement creates a fund that loans money to workers to pay the upfront money required to rent a new apartment/house (like first and last month’s rent and a security deposit) or to help buy down the interest on a mortgage.
- Seasonal Workers: Our proposal makes several changes to the seasonal article to make the transition from season to season easier for workers and to give workers more access to fill gaps in seasonal positions.
Other changes
Management also proposed these changes yesterday:
- Article 21 – Grievance and Arbitration Procedure: Management proposed revamping this article for clarity. In addition, they made changes to some of their response timelines and added that all grievances must have a steward separate from the grievant at all steps.
- Article 57 – Bereavement: Brings bereavement leave in line with OFLA - must use accrued leave, then Leave Without Pay.
- Article 123 – Inclement or Hazardous Conditions: Changes requirement for closure notices before 5am to as soon as closure or curtailment decisions are made. Clarifies process for closure of office following the beginning of an employee’s shift.
We are hitting the road from May 1st to May 7th to meet with workers all across the state. Join one of our events to learn more about what is happening at the bargaining table and to share your priorities.
3/21
Both teams passed their economic packages today. Below you can see what each team proposed on some of the key issues:
| Proposal | Our Proposals | Management’s Proposals |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of Living Increases | July 1, 2025 – 8% July 1, 2026 – CPI-W +5%, but no less than 5% | December 1, 2025 – 2.3% December 1, 2026 – 3% |
| Steps | Steps locked in for the CBA. 2 new steps (removing bottom 2 steps where they are not truncated). Accelerated timeline for longterm employees to move to new steps. | Steps locked in. Status quo on everything else |
| Health Insurance | Highest cost plan will have a 95%/5% premium share. All other plans would be paid at 100% by the State. Protect gender-affirming care in our health insurance. | Status Quo |
| Holidays | Add Indigenous Peoples’ Day and Transgender Day of Visibility | No new holidays |
| Vacation | Increase vacation leave to have parity with management. Allow people carrying high levels of vacation an ability to cash out more frequently | Status Quo |
| Personal Leave Days | Increase everybody’s personal leave by 8 hours for a total (32 hours). People who work fully in-person would get an additional 8 hours on top of that (40). | Status Quo |
Payroll Process:
The state proposed changes to pay schedules that they believe will resolve ongoing issues with the Workday payroll system. Specifically, management proposed:
- Timesheets would be submitted for hours already worked, not hours we expect to work in the future (eliminating forecasting hours).
- Overtime-eligible workers would be paid an hourly wage rather than a monthly salary.
- The State will transition from paying monthly (12 pay periods per year) to paying bi-weekly (26 pay periods per year). Being paid, every other week rather than the first of the month.
They also proposed a $500 one-time payment to address the gap in pay that would be created when transitioning to paying for hours already worked.
They shared a memo with our bargaining team that outlines why they believe these changes will address issues with the payroll system. Management was also clear that this is their top priority in bargaining. Though they provided this memo, they have not proposed details on how they would like to calculate hourly wages or what the lag period would be if forecasting is eliminated.
We know that the current payroll system does not work well for everyone, especially lower income workers and people dealing with chronic medical conditions. That is why we have proposed penalty pay for workers whose paychecks are short or missing and that all workers have a right to a repayment plan if they are overpaid by the state, no matter why the overpayment happened.
Our payroll system needs to ensure that people living paycheck-to-paycheck have the money to pay their bills. The current system does not do this. Protecting everyone’s pay and making sure all state workers, but especially those of us who are low paid, are able make ends meet are our top priorities in negotiations on this issue.
What is next? Our plan is to create space over the next few months to hear from you about this proposal, and to have a broad conversation within our union about what our vision a functional, worker-centered payroll system should look like. Please be on the lookout for more info soon about how you can be part of that conversation.
3/12
Our team passed proposals from our 21st Century Workplace section of our platform. This included these concepts:
- Increasing protections for remote work agreements, improvements in the Union’s ability to protect remote work access, and more specific steps management must take when rescinding agreements.
- Improvements to the Inclement and Hazardous Conditions article.
- Implementing protections for workers for implementation of Artificial Intelligence in the workplace.
- Improvements to layoff protections.
- Penalty payments for payroll errors and access to payment plans for all overpayments.
- Clarity around workplace designation for remote workers.
Management still has not shared their proposals on economics or payroll changes involving Workday, though we expect those proposals in our next meeting. Management passed proposals integrating equal pay processes throughout all the position transitions an employee might make during their employment at the State. Our bargaining team is still in the process of reviewing these proposals.
We will meet with management at the Central Table again on March 20th and it’s going to be a big day. It is the last day that either side can pass an initial proposal! Both sides will be passing their economics and changes regarding the Workday system.
2/28
Bargaining is officially under way! Yesterday, we held our first full bargaining session with management, marking the start of exchanging proposals. Over a hundred members joined us on zoom, sending management a strong message—State workers are engaged and ready to fight for a fair contract.
In our opening statement, we laid out our union’s top priorities: Economic Justice, 21st Century Workplaces, Workload & Safety, and Union Power. You can check out our opening statement slide deck for more details.
While they didn’t actually offer proposals, management told us in their opening statement that they will be making proposals to change payroll processes. Specifically, they said they want to shift overtime eligible employees to hourly pay, move our pay periods to biweekly, and eliminate forecasting in timesheets. We don’t have specifics on the details of these proposals yet, but we will share more information with you once we do.
In addition to making our opening statement, our team also passed the proposals in our Union Power category, including:
-
-
- Strengthening our union by giving newly hired in-person workers the opportunity to meet with their union reps in-person during their new employee orientations
- Ending the state’s anti-union practice of giving management service employees higher pay than people in our bargaining unit who do the same work
- Improving the timelines in our grievance process to make it easier for stewards to enforce our contract
-
Our next bargaining sessions will be Wednesday, March 12th and Thursday, March 13th. Our negotiations are open for members of our union to observe, so be on the lookout for invitations!
2/6
State Bargaining is getting into full swing and while no proposals have been passed yet, we still have a lot to report! Firstly, thank you so much to the almost 8500 members that completed the bargaining survey. This was over 2000 more participants than in 2022 and we’re excited about that level of engagement. The elected bargaining team is reviewing the survey now to strategize the best way forward and we should have more information about our priorities after the bargaining conference next month. The team has also already met to elect their leading co-chairs. Congratulations to Angela Ward from ODFW and Joe Dyer from OHA – Pendleton Cottage. We know you have what it takes to lead our state workers to victory!
We know how important it is for state workers to win a fair contract and get wage increases that keep up with all the inflation and price gouging by greedy corporations over the past several years. Governor Tina Kotek needs to know that as well and that is why we have crafted an online action you can take to let her know she needs to support state workers during this difficult time by approving a fair budget and contract. Send a letter today!
1/29
Friday (1/31) is payday and it’s going to be a big one! Starting January 1st, you received a 6.55% COLA (Cost of Living Adjustment). This pay increase is a result of the hard work and determination of State workers during the 2023 bargaining campaign. They refused to accept the 2% increase management proposed and organized to win their largest pay increase in more than 50 years.
That’s the power of being in union with your coworkers. It’s also why union workers, on average make about 14% more than non union workers make. We can’t take that for granted, we need to stay organized and engaged so we can continue to win for everyone.
- Our bargaining team met with the State for the first time in December to approve ground rules for this year's negotiations. We will start meeting to share proposals in early February.
-
- Currently, our bargaining team is reviewing the thousands of bargaining surveys that Union members submitted. We collected 1,200 more surveys than last session, which tells us that State workers are ready to bargain!
Español - Русский - Tiếng Việt
7/11
We have settled at the Human Services Coalition table! It was a tough bargaining session with a steady lack of engagement from the State up until our last two bargaining sessions. On 7/7 the Coalition had mediated bargaining, which helped us reach a settlement. We ran a solid campaign. Thousands of members engaged around workload and safety both in the legislature, via email, and during in-person actions. We won significant improvements to our priority proposal for Safety & Health, but our fight isn’t over! We will continue to fight for improved workloads and safety for the Human Service Coalition next year and beyond. See the full TA here.
Your bargaining team kept pushing and pushing on Critical Incident leave and Remote work proposals until the end. The Agencies continually rejected our proposals. The Bargaining team decided to move these two issues to the Central Table to continue the fight.
7/3
Human services is having a mediation session to settle all outstanding bargaining items on Monday, July 7th. This is a closed session, as mediation is only open to bargaining team members.
6/27
On June 25th, 2025, the parties held their last scheduled bargaining session. After months of delay, the State finally started engaging in negotiations and we were able to TA several items:
- A new LOA that provides access to Union members to sit on interview panels for bargaining-unit positions.
- Article 40.1m Penalty Pay – new 4-hour benefit (2 hours for a virtual visit) at overtime rate for Child Welfare staff who are required to attend court on their day off.
- An improved LOA on phone monitoring/recording that now includes OED members.
- A new LOA that improves the shift bidding process for OED.
- Significant improvements to the Temporary Lodging LOA (no TA yet) with added scheduling and contractor protections.
On July 7th, we head into mediation with the Employment Relations Board (ERB). ERB requires that mediation sessions are closed to the public. We plan to bargain on priority issues, as summarized below. The State is taking hard positions against bargaining any economic improvements, stating that expected Federal budget cuts will severely impact the Oregon budget:
- Safety (We’ve made progress on Emergency Building Plans).
- Paid Critical Incident Leave (The State refuses to bargain on this item).
- Remote Work (The State refuses to bargain on this item).
- Workload (The State refuses to bargain on this item).
- Boot Allowance for Oregon Resilience and Emergency Management (OREM) members.
- FLSA exempt straight time accrual and payout improvements.
6/13
This past week your Human Services Bargaining Team was able to bring home some victories for workplace democracy and recognition of special duties. We’ve reached tentative agreements on having union workers on interview panels when bargaining unit vacancies are being filled and a special pay differential for child welfare staff who must report to court hearings as part of their duties.
Unfortunately, many other critical issues are at a stalemate. After months of bargaining and countless hours spent in negotiations, the State has refused to give us a single proposal on workload, child welfare caseload ratios and paid critical incident leave. At the same time, they have rejected all union proposals on these issues outright. This is not a respectful way to bargain and a clear sign that we need to turn up the heat.
Our next bargaining session is on 6/25, and we want you to show up as an observer to show management how invested you are in resolving these issues. Keep an eye on your emails on that date to access the meeting link.
5/30
Thank you for the 50+ members who joined bargaining today to negotiate over health, safety and workload!
Workload is a top bargaining priority.
- The State did not respond to the Union’s legal request for copies of Workload Models and Remote Work guidelines. SEIU will pursue an Unfair Labor Practice charge against the State if management fails to respond.
- The State reported that Child Welfare is 125% overstaffed. Meanwhile, among primary staff last month: 43% of CPS staff, 29% of permanency staff and 19% of certification staff had caseloads above caseload ratios!
- We need to hear from Child Welfare staff who are assigned caseloads above approved ratios and the impacts that has on staff and clients! Submit your story here. https://forms.office.com/r/nXSP7EZzu4
On 5.28, SEIU bargained on the following items. The State did not respond to any proposals and did not show up with any counters:
- Article 32.1 Overtime. Exempt status FLSA employees overtime cap increased to 240 hours. Passed originally by SEIU on 3.19.25
- Article 86.1 Workload Prioritization (includes workload protections for all staff/puts CPS Caseload Ratios in the Contract). SEIU originally passed on 4.4.25, on 4.30 ER rejected the entire proposal. SEIU re-introduced on 5.28.
- Article 138.1 Working Remotely. Proposed clear guidelines for approving/denying remote work. SEIU proposed on 3.19.25. State failed to respond.
- Safety Package Proposal (A101, 103, 136). Includes mandatory safety plans at offices, paid critical incident leave, implementation of safety flags for difficult and sensitive clients. SEIU proposed on 3.5.25.
- LOA on call metrics. Ensure all workers are not unfairly monitored on work phone calls.
- LOA on Interview Rights. The right for SEIU members to sit on interview panels.
5/16
Management canceled this week's meeting because the LRU representative is on vacation. The next meeting is scheduled for 5/28.
5/2
SEIU’s bargaining team is disappointed by the State’s failure to address the Union’s major bargaining proposals. Our next bargaining date is not for another month:
Safety: The State rejected nearly all of the Union’s safety language, including paid critical incident leave, improved safety plans with a responsibility to notify employees and mandatory safety notices over Everbridge. The State was unable to answer basic safety questions including whose responsibility it is to write safety plans, where these plans live or how they are communicated to State workers. SEIU originally presented our safety proposals on March 5th and it appears that basic questions were left unanswered. Management’s response left us feeling that the State does not take safety seriously.
Workload models: The State rejected our proposal for all workers to have workload models and for the State to follow the Child Welfare caseload ratios without discussion.
Remote Work: The State rejected our remote work proposal in its entirety without discussion.
Join us on May 14th for our safety pickets! Check your email for more information. The plan is to hold the Safety Breaks at lunchtime (ex: 1130am-130pm) and you can work with an organizer about planning for the mid-morning or mid-afternoon 15-minute break. With lunchtime pickets, folks can rotate on the line for alternating lunch schedules. For remote workers, attend a Safety Break that is closest to where you live to show your solidarity! Contact your organizer for a list of CATs at your worksite, to inform them about the picket, to bring signs/swag, and to help order lunch.
4/18
Last month, we passed proposals to improve safety, remote work, unreasonable workloads and overtime. In February, we filed a request for information on safety and workload.
Two weeks ago, we scheduled a Union bargaining team work session to finalize our proposals. We expected management would use this time to review the Union’s safety, remote work and unreasonable workload proposals passed in March.
This week, however, state management cancelled our bargaining session at the last minute, saying they needed more time to prepare.
We meet next with management on April 30th and have only four bargaining sessions left to negotiate on critical issues raised by our members.
To date, the Department of Administration Services’ labor relations management team has yet to respond to any of our Union’s proposals or information requests.
We are disappointed and frustrated by how slowly management is moving, particularly since they have not addressed our safety, remote work or workload proposals with the urgency they deserve.
To date, we have passed, at the coalition table, proposals on the following articles:
- Article 10.1 Union Stewards
- Article 32.1 Overtime
- Article 40.1m Penalty Pay
- Article 45.1m filling of vacancies
- Article 45.1c filling vacancies
- Article 49.1 Trial Service
- Article 61.1 Leaves Without Pay
- Article 86.1 Workload Prioritization
- Article 90.1 Work Schedules
- Safety package Proposal (A101, 103, A136 relevant coalition subsections)
- 1 Working Remotely
- LOAs
- Master LOA tracking list
- Modification LOA 00.00-16-293 temp lodging
- Modification LOA 35.1.23-469 Metrics
- NEW LOA Telematics
- NEW LOA 10.1c & 10.1m Interview Panels
- NEW LOA Article 90.1c Employment
We invite you to join us as an observer to bargaining at our April 30th session. We will send out the participation link before the meeting.
4/4
NO ONE SHOULD FEEL UNSAFE AT WORK!
We have made proposals on Workload and Safety for ALL Workers in ALL ODHS/OHA/OED Programs to hold management accountable in creating safe workplaces and manageable workloads.
ODHS management states that Child Welfare is overstaffed by 125%. At the same time, safety incidents have increased dramatically coalition wide which coincides with significant increases in workload. Data has been provided by ODHS that Safety Incidents have risen 453% from 2019-2023. Of the data reported in 2023, over 78% of Safety Incidents reported were of a Medium to High Level of Severity.
Highlights of our Safety Proposals:
- Paid Critical Incident Leave for violence and trauma experienced at work.
- Supervisor and/or Expert led worksite safety plans and notify employees of safety incidents.
- Mandatory supervisor support for staff involved in safety incidents.
- Security guards at worksites with repeated safety incidents.
- Standard protocols when there is a safety incident at worksites.
List of Articles proposed:
- Article 49.1: Employees in the Human Services Coalition in a trial service for lateral transfer or promotion do not need management approval to return to a classification or comparable salary level, which the employee previously held unless charges are filed and they are discharged as provided in Article 20.
- To create equity for workers wishing to return to their original position if/when desired from a lateral transfer or promotion.
- Article 61.1: Being able to use Leave Without Pay without having to exhaust accrued leave. Listing instances to deny Leave Without Pay.
- Article 40.1(M): Intent of the parties that there shall be no “make work” assigned to employees who are called back to work for court appearances.
- Article 10.1: Improving language around using agency’s email system and including instant messaging system.
- Article 45. 1M: Improve hardship transfer process and prioritize internal candidates over external for promotions and lateral transfers. We want employees to only work ONE job when they've been promoted, not the new one AND the old one.
- 45.1C: Improving language to better define transfers and promotions. Prioritizing internal OED and ODHS/OHA candidates over external. Requiring management to provide a written explanation of a job denial. Increasing notification of program transfers from 5 to 30 days.
- 86.1M: Codifiying CW Workload models to hold management accountable and adding penalty pay for assigned work.
- 86.1: New language improving workload prioritization to eliminate progressive discipline related to workload, caseload, or timely assignments.
LOAs (Letters of Agreement):
- LOA 35.1 Recorded/Monitored Calls & Call Metrics: Intent is to not have calls and call metrics used as discipline but rather as training opportunities.
- Temporary Lodging LOA: $5 differential, contracted staff will be the ones awake, and yearly de-escalation training and protocol review will be provided for staff. Anytime weapons, drugs, etc. are confiscated from TL, then those items will be removed within two hours of the discovery. Shifts lasting 10 or more hours will be compensated with 20-minute rest periods.
3/21
The Human Services Coalition bargaining team has reached its first tentative agreement for this round of bargaining. They won a major victory with new scheduling bidding rights for the Oregon Child Abuse Hotline, an issue that’s been outstanding since last summer!
The team also submitted proposals to management regarding Article 32 – Overtime and Article 138 - Working Remotely.
- The overtime proposal included increasing the compensatory/straight time limit from 160 to 240 hours and allowing it to be cashed out monthly.
- The remote work proposal pushes back against the State’s arbitrary use of ‘business needs’ to end remote work agreements and sets up a process that forces the employer to justify what these needs are. They also proposed that workers can have international remote work agreements
Management did not present any proposals and did not respond to the safety package that the union passed previously.
3/5
The Human Services Coalition bargained with management on Feb 20th and March 5th. Below is some of what happened at the last bargaining sessions:
On February 20th, we proposed rules to support Oregon Child Abuse Hotline employees to create a fair system for the selection of new shifts. This is a continuation of an Unfair Labor Practice/Demand to Bargain charge that we filed back in the summer of 2024.
On March 5th, we continued our discussions on shift bidding and tumbling for the Oregon Child Abuse Hotline and we proposed a Safety Package Proposal (3 articles – 101 Safety & Health, 103 Difficult and Sensitive Clients, Article 136 Critical Incident Leave). These proposals would make improvements to protect the safety and health of State Workers, including:
-
- Paid critical incident leave for violence and trauma experienced at work
- Worksite safety plans and employee notification of safety incidents
- Mandatory supervisor support to staff involved in safety incidents.
- A boot allowance for Oregon Emergency Management facilities staff.
- Security guards at worksites with repeated safety incidents
We cannot win these things through negotiations alone. The best way to express our solidarity is through escalation starting with signing the bargaining petition and sharing your story:
Safety in the Workplace - No One Should Feel Unsafe at Work
Español - Русский - Tiếng Việt
7/3
You’ve probably already heard that the legislature failed to pass a transportation package to close ODOT’s budget gap. That means that the layoffs we were fighting to avoid are now coming. We’re working on passing an LOA (Letter of Agreement) to DAS to protect workers facing layoffs. We’ll keep you in the loop about this and provide tools to navigate layoffs at this website: https://seiu503.org/odot-layoff-information/
To help guide you through this process we are hosting an ODOT townhall where we will explain the contract language, take questions and give people an opportunity to connect and plan our next moves. We hope to see you there!
Wednesday, July 9, from 6:00 to 8:00 PM
Register for the virtual town hall here.
In better news, ODOT Coalition bargaining was in session all day on July 1st, and we reached a tentative agreement with management just after 10pm. Your delegation fought long and hard for improvements to your contract on a variety of issues. We were able to secure the following, in addition to other victories reported earlier:
- Union Rights (Article 10.3). Increased steward maximum from 1 to 2 (or 20%) of the work unit. Allowed for steward to travel on paid time to represent a worker in person if a manager, lead investigator or appointing authority are in person for the interview.
- Vacation (Article 66.3). Increased week of choice from one per year to two per year for ODOT, DMV and OPRD.
- Rest breaks at OPRD (Article 90.3B). Strengthened language so mgmt. has to have a valid business reason to determine when a rest period cannot be taken.
- Special Provisions (Article 113.3). Added Agriculture and OPRD to this article to provide communication devices in field vehicles (previously OWRD/OWEB only).
- Boots and safety clothing (Article 122.3). ODOT increased clothing allowance to $395 and prescription safety glasses to $200. Boots at OPRD no longer have a safety toe or felt bottom requirement. All permanent employees at OPRD that are required to wear boots shall be eligible for reimbursement for the purchase, repair or maintenance of boots up to $250 a biennium; OPRD seasonals will be eligible for $250 per biennium starting in their second season. Water folks secured a $200 reimbursement (OWRD) and a $200 allowance (OWEB) for items not already provided by the agency. Agriculture maintained current contract language while a grievance goes to arbitration later this year to address the agency’s failure to provide protective clothing and footwear.
- Critical Incident Leave (Article 136). Created a new Letter of Agreement to explore the resources and current leave types that are available, or needed, for employees experiencing traumatic events in the workplace.
Stay tuned for a complete summary of victories from the ODOT Coalition table. We now turn to Central Table to support their efforts to reach an agreement on economics for the entire state unit.
A big shout out to the ODOT Coalition bargaining team that spent many hours discussing problems, reviewing contract language, proposing solutions, strategizing pathways, amending counter proposals, and supporting delegates from other agencies to navigate forward to an agreement. Please send a note of thanks to your co-workers:
Dept of Agriculture: Tash Wilson, Michael Williams, Aisha Young
DOGAMI: Vaughn Balzer
Dept of Forestry: Michele Huffman, Megan Frizzell, David Showalter, Matthew Goolsby
Dept of Fish and Wildlife: Angela Ward, Eric Ollerenshaw, Michelle Jones
DMV: Michelle Godin, Dan Mears, Janel Borghero
ODOT: Ritchie Maes, Greg Chasteen, Lee Erickson, Lon Stockebrand, Jason Lawrence, Phil Smith
OPRD: Elika Paki, Sarah Heinsohn, Jennifer Burnett
OWRD/OWEB: Austin Leep, Arla Davis
6/27
The ODOT Coalition bargaining delegation met with management on June 17 when we reached a tentative agreement on a majority of our proposals, including:
- ODOT. Increased meal tickets and committed to simplifying the process of receiving them.
- ODF. Increased boot reimbursement from $300 to $400 for permanent folks, and $150 to $200 for seasonals.
- DOGAMI. Increased clothing allowance from $100 to $200.
- ODF+. Added a day of rest (8 hours) with straight time compensation for being on incident more than 21 days, and another day (8 hours) after 30 days. Clarified that all coalition agencies that have employees rostered on Incident Management Teams are eligible for Incident Management Rest.
- ODFW. Added Microbiologist 2 and 3, OS2, and AS2 to the list of classifications eligible for the $325 uniform reimbursement and updated the Learning and Development Specialist classifications. Increased reimbursements from three uniform shirts to four, and one pair of pants to two for seasonals and LDs.
- OPRD+ODF. Clarified that returning seasonals can finish trial service in other locations from their first season.
- DMV+ODOT+OPRD. New LOA to review and analyze hiring trends on an annual basis to ensure “fair consideration” is given to internal candidates. The review will be shared with LMCs at the end of each year.
- ODOT+ODF+OPRD. New LOA features safety process while working in illegal campsites.
- ODF. New LOA to study compensation for wildland firefighting classifications to inform wage increases in 2027.
- ODF. New LOA to annually debrief fire season and use of Incident Management Teams (IMT) at Labor Managment Committee; clarify methodology for documenting IMT qualifications and experience and create transparency for IMT selection process.
- OPRD+ODF. Strengthened LOA on gender discrimination and sexual harassment with a commitment to anti-retaliation and anti-discrimination policies, annual monitoring reports at LMC and a confidential reporting system.
- ODOT. New LOA to jointly explore Essential Worker Differential implementation.
Of the more than 30 proposals that we had on the table, eight (8) proposals remain open. We will tackle those remaining items at our next session on July 1, including:
- Boots and safety clothing for Agriculture, Water Resources/OWEB, OPRD and ODOT
- Work schedules and breaks at OPRD
- Critical Incident Leave
- Vacation choice frequency at ODOT, DMV and OPRD
Next Steps: Observe bargaining and support your delegation
Our next session with management is July 1, starting at 9am. We invite you to join and observe negotiations, show support, and help apply pressure as we push toward agreement. We have a special request for folks that are impacted by the remaining proposals on the table to attend. These include:
- Folks at Agriculture who are impacted by the agency’s lack of support for safety footwear.
- Seasonal folks at Parks that don’t/didn’t have appropriate footwear for their job duties.
- Folks at Parks that have been cheated out of taking rest periods.
You can join the session using this zoom link to observe negotiations on your breaks and lunch, or you can listen in the background if your job is such that you could have the radio on in the background. We will send a reminder and Zoom link on Monday, June 30.
6/13
The ODOT Coalition bargaining team met with management on June 10th and had a productive meeting with both sides passing packages. We passed three packages on a variety of issues including:
- Boots and safety clothing for ODOT and OPRD
- Increasing meal tickets and access at ODOT
- Overtime and on-call based on seniority at ODOT
- Boots and incident management rest at Forestry to break up long stints of working the fire line without a day off
- Fair consideration for internal candidates at DMV, OPRD and ODOT
- Protecting work schedule consistency at OPRD
- Improving conditions during trial service for returning seasonals at OPRD and Forestry
- Safety while working in illegal campsites
Members leaders, including someone from ODOT District 14, gave excellent presentations on these issues. They spoke about their importance and why they are a priority. Management passed back several proposals without making additional movement, instead reverting to their earlier positions. We still have not reached any tentative agreements with management on the 30 proposals that we have on the table, so we have scheduled an additional bargaining session for June 13th, ahead of our June 17th session.
5/30
The ODOT Coalition bargaining delegation met with management on May 27th when both sides passed packages with various proposals. We passed a package on issues impacting workers at the Department of Agriculture, Water Resources, and OWEB, including:
- Boots and safety clothing for people that work in the field at Water Resources.
- Boots and safety clothing for people that work in the field at Agriculture.
- A career ladder for Office Specialists and Administrative Specialists to gain experience and create mobility in the Natural Resource Specialist series.
Union members from the Department of Agriculture presented on issues impacting them and made compelling arguments for the Employer to provide safety clothing and internal mobility for workers.
Our team continues to work through additional issues including:
- Improving language to provide more transparency and fairness in hiring and promotions.
- Expanding use of critical incident leave.
- Creating safeguards for work in illegal campsites.
We have 30 proposals that remain on the table with two more sessions scheduled for next month. Our next session with management is June 10.
5/16
The ODOT Coalition bargaining delegation met with management on May 14 when we passed counter proposals on four packages, including:
- Removing CDL burden from low wage classifications at ODFW.
- Securing bargaining unit representation on hiring panels at OPRD.
- Improving conditions for firefighters and Incident Management Teams at Forestry.
- Improving safety clothing allowances at all agencies within the coalition.
- Increasing seniority rights at ODOT.
- Increasing meal tickets and access at ODOT.
Our team continues to work through additional issues including:
- Improving language to provide for more transparency and fairness in hiring and promotions.
- Expanding use of critical incident leave.
- Expanding vacation week of choice from one week per year to two weeks.
- Securing safety clothing and boot allowances at Agriculture, as well as creating career ladder opportunities within the agency.
Our next session with management is May 27.
5/2
The ODOT Coalition bargaining delegation met with management on April 30th and we received five packages of counter proposals. The packages bundle together their responses to the proposals we have passed to mgmt. since February. So far they are a mixed bag.
Our team is now working through those proposals and will offer additional counters at our next session on May 13th. We have not yet reached a tentative agreement on any of the 30 proposals we have on the table, and our team continues to work through a variety of issues, including:
- Safety: Expanding use of critical incident leave, and increases to safety gear
- Vacation use: Expanding week of choice from one week per year to two
- ODFW: Reducing CDL requirements for low wage workers
- OPRD: Inclusion of represented workers on hiring panels
- Agriculture: Creating a career ladder into the Natural Resource Specialist series
- ODOT: strengthening seniority rights for on-call and overtime
- ODF: Compensation and classification studies for Incident Management Teams and firefighting positions
4/18
The ODOT Coalition met with management on April 15 for our first session after the deadline passed for initial proposals. We now have a full lay of the land with 30 proposals on the table that we will negotiate in the weeks ahead to address a variety of issues including safety, vacation use, internal hiring, on-call and OT at ODOT, classification studies at ODF, improvements for low wage workers and critical incident leave. Mgmt. sent us counters on:
- Steward numbers at ODOT, DMV, OPRD, ODFW and ODF (Article 10.3)
- Filling of Vacancies and internal mobility (Article 45.3AB)
- Use of vacation leave at ODOT, DMV and OPRD and cancellation of vacation throughout the coalition (Article 66.3)
- Work schedules at OPRD (Article 90.3B)
- Special Provisions for safety (Article 113.3H,I)
It was notable that the Department of Agriculture continues to deny proposals that would provide safety measures for employees working in the field. The most recent example being their denial of our proposal to require two-way communication devices in vehicles when Agriculture employees are performing job duties in remote areas of the state. We will continue to advocate at the table for such safety measures for Ag workers.
Another notable moment was mgmt.’s response to our proposal to better define what “fair consideration” means in the hiring process of existing employees who are seeking opportunities within the agency. Mgmt. indicated that fairness would be too administratively burdensome.
Stay tuned for upcoming invitations to join bargaining as an observer via Zoom to show your support for the bargaining team.
4/4
Union bargaining team passes proposals to improve working conditions ahead of deadline
Your ODOT coalition bargaining team passed an additional 13 proposals, ahead of an April 4th deadline, addressing a variety of issues important to workers. A major theme of what your team is proposing is to put some teeth behind seniority language and to make sure it counts when considering who will be hired into new positions and who gets overtime. As the front line of your agencies your experience is extremely valuable and it’s time that management respects it. Putting in years of hard work needs to count for something. Here are the details:
- Amending overtime for ODOT to include seniority.
- Increasing meal tickets at ODOT.
- Improving transfer and promotion opportunities for internal candidates at DMV, ODOT and OPRD.
- Improving access to earned vacation hours for DMV, ODOT and OPRD.
- Ensuring communication devices are in field vehicles at Agriculture and OPRD.
- Creating a career ladder for OS (office specialist) and AS (administrative specialist) folks to move into the NRS (natural resource specialist) series at Agriculture (New Letter of Agreement).
- Creating light duty opportunities for folks at OPRD that sustain injuries (New Letter of Agreement).
- Increasing Union involvement in hiring panels and LMC at OPRD (New Letters of Agreement)
- Addressing sexual harassment and gender discrimination at ODF and OPRD (Letter of Agreement).
- Implementing safety measures for employees that are tasked to work around illegal campsites, including exposure to fentanyl, feces and bodily fluids (New Letter of Agreement).
- Creating a work group and class and comp study for all Incident Management Team positions and duties at ODF (New Letter of Agreement).
- Directing a class and comp study for wildland firefighting positions.
Management did not pass any more new proposals. Our team now shifts to develop counter proposals ahead of our next meeting with management on April 15th. Stay tuned and keep staying active!
3/21
On March 18th, the ODOT Coalition delegation met for the third session with management and passed three more initial proposals:
- A new article for ODOT that would clarify on-call assignments and use of vehicles during on-call.
- A new article to clarify that employees at ODFW and OPRD cannot be required to use their personal vehicle to conduct work.
- Amended the Union Rights article to improve steward representation at OPRD, DMV, ODF, ODFW and ODOT.
Management passed two more initial proposals:
- Changes to Article 45.3G that would impact how vacancies are filled, and how promotions and non-voluntary transfers are handled at the Department of Agriculture.
- A new ODOT-only article specifying when the Essential Worker Differential applies to maintenance crews.
Our team continues to work on initial proposals to pass before the April deadline. Stay tuned for opportunities in April and May to observe coalition bargaining via Zoom.
3/5
The ODOT Coalition bargaining team met with management last week and passed four more proposals to management around issues related to safety and workload. Specifically, we proposed:
-
- New language on critical incident leave to support workers that experience direct trauma at work, including verbal threats and witnessing fatalities.
- Expanding rest and recovery at Oregon Department of Forestry to meet industry standard after 21-day assignments on all-hazard incident management teams.
- Improving work schedules for Oregon Parks and Recreation Department.
- Improving CDL requirements for the lowest paid workers at Oregon Department of Fish Wildlife.
Management passed two proposals regarding returning seasonals at both Oregon Parks and Recreation Department and Oregon Department of Forestry. At both agencies, if a worker ends their first season and then accepts a position in the same classification at a different location, it is considered a lateral transfer if the employee completes their season and indicates an intention to return, and they will continue with the same trial service.
Management also passed their positions on existing Letters of Agreement. There was significant agreement in this area, with a few exceptions, including management’s position that the Oregon Department of Forestry will continue its commitment to confronting sexual harassment and discrimination at the agency via Labor Management Committees (LMC), but that the Oregon Parks and Recreation Department would like to end their commitment to discuss the problem with Union leaders at LMC.
2/21
This week marked our first coalition bargaining meetings with management. The State of Oregon workforce is divided up into four coalitions: Human Services, Institutions, ODOT and Special Agencies. We also negotiate at Central Table, where language that impacts everyone (including pay increases) is bargained. We will hold our first meeting at Central Table on Thursday, February 27th at 1:30pm.
At the ODOT coalition our team shared their framework for bargaining with management in this opening statement, highlighting that workers in the ODOT Coalition keep our roads safe, fight fires, care for our parks, and manage vital resources like fish, wildlife, minerals, agriculture and water.
We passed a proposal for seven agencies (ODOT, OPRD, ODF, ODFW, DOGAMI, Ag, and Water) to improve language in Article 122.3, which deals with boots, protective clothing and uniforms. Management passed a proposal to clarify who gets meal allowances in Article 33.3A.
Español - Русский - Tiếng Việt
7/11
The Specials Coalition reached a TA with management this week! Below are some of the wins we had in this round of bargaining:
- Stronger language around the filling of vacancies for DCBS and Workers’ Comp, Treasury, Veterans Affairs, and the Licensing Boards. We were also able to fight back takeaways on this language from OHCS and Education.
- A process to ensure that there is a union member on interview panels for bargaining unit positions in every Specials Coalition agency.
- A process to raise safety concerns about the public spaces of buildings and language about how those concerns can be addressed.
- Language that makes labor management committees more accessible for some of our smallest agencies – the licensing boards.
- Additional stewards for BOLI.
- Stronger language for determining if workers need protective clothing.
We also had a very frustrating conversation with management’s team about a proposal we made about the pay rates for the workers that coach students at the School for the Deaf. Management gave us their proposal late and then didn’t have the resources they needed to bargain over it seriously on Tuesday. We agreed to continue our conversations about that proposal through our central table team. Look for updates on this discussion next week.
7/3
Your Specials Coalition bargaining team bargained for ten hours this past week to try to reach a settlement. Not only did we not come to a settlement, but management has yet to pass us an initial counter to a proposal that we gave them months ago.
They did give us a response to our Working Remotely proposal, which was a no. We continue to bargain over remote work at the central table and will discuss a counter proposal at the coalition table during our next meeting.
We passed multiple packages to management on issues at individual agencies and are preparing to pass proposals on how members can transfer and promote at our next meeting.
We were able to TA on one proposal, which makes labor management committees more accessible for our licensing boards.
6/27
This week management showed up to the bargaining table with responses to our proposals that were mostly “no.” Every single one of the proposals that we put across the table to address safety for employees received a “no.” We believe that when working in offices that are open to the public, employees should feel safe; when working out in the field with the public, employees should feel safe. And, if they don’t, they should know what the path is to get support from their agency.
In addition to all of the no's we received, management showed up to our second to last scheduled bargaining session without responses to all our proposals. There are proposals that we gave them in February and March that they still haven’t responded to and we will not receive their initial response until our JULY meeting.
We will be showing up to our next bargaining session prepared to push management for responses and to hold firm on the things that are important for members of the Specials coalition.
6/13
This week was our second to last scheduled bargaining session. Coming into this session, management still owed us initial counters on 8 of our proposals. These counters were nowhere to be found. Our team expressed frustration about the lack of response to those proposals and said that we were not willing to both receive and settle proposals in our last bargaining session, we need more time to deliberate on them. Management heard our concerns and committed to having responses to all the proposals in our next bargaining session. In turn we scheduled one more additional full day session.
Our team passed management back responses on several of the different Article 45 proposals we have on the table, once again emphasizing our insistence on transferring and promoting people from within the agency whenever possible.
5/30
We came to work this week and are still waiting for management to pass counters on several of our proposals. We continue to work on proposals to get union members into interview spaces (New Letter of Agreement for Article 10) and protect workers from schedule modification without clear rules (Article 90.5). Management is taking aim at multiple agencies' language that protects represented workers when they apply for internal positions by proposing to blend this agency-specific language into one general article (Article 45.5).
We still feel as if we have a long way to go and very few bargaining sessions left. Keep talking to your co-workers about bargaining and showing up to participate in your sub-locals' meetings and join the June 5th Rally - the only way for us to win this contract is together!
5/16
This week management passed us 2 counter proposals. One of those counters was on a proposal we had passed that would make Labor Management Committees more accessible to smaller agencies within the coalition. Their second counter was on our work schedules proposal.
We passed a package with counters on managements proposals for ODE/DELC, and PERS and we continued our conversations about the safety proposals. Management continues to make little movement at the table and it is clear that their priorities do not include ensuring worker safety for those who are working in the field or engaging with members of the public.
5/2
This week, management’s team gave us four different counter proposals – they still owe us sixteen more, so there is a lot of work to be done!
One of their counters was on a proposal we made that would allow there to be a bargaining unit member, appointed by the union, on all hiring panels. We think that having a bargaining unit member on every interview panel not only creates transparency within the hiring process but also creates opportunities for people to gain a better understanding of what is being looked for in the interview process. In addition, it makes sense that people who are currently performing the work participate in choosing who might make a good co-worker. The counter proposal from management shows that they do not share these values.
Once again, in their counters to some of our proposals on Article 45 – Filling of Vacancies, the management team showed that their priorities are about the speed of the hiring process and not about how they can support current workers and their career development.
Finally, we were able to make a little progress on a proposal that we made for the Licensing Boards in getting Labor Management Committees to be something that would work in their Agencies despite the small numbers of employees at some of them.
4/18
We were able to reach agreement with management on five different proposals this past Tuesday. The agreements included:
- Additional stewards for BOLI
- Language at DCBS to strengthen a worker’s ability to transfer/promotion
- Increasing the number of comp time hours that workers at the licensing boards can accrue
We also spent time asking management clarifying questions around proposals that they gave us that would impact worker safety and accessibility in the workplace. While they were able to answer some of the questions, we are waiting for follow-up from them. We will be tackling these issues again in our next bargaining session.
4/4
On Tuesday, your Specials Coalition bargaining team and management both exchanged their final initial proposals.
- Our union team passed many proposals including ones that would create a standard practice at each agency for how leadwork assignments are being shared with workers and how they are being filled. We passed several proposals for different agencies focusing on how to make internal job opportunities – both transfers and promotions – available to current employees first.
- Management’s team passed very few proposals, but the ones that they did pass focused on speeding up the hiring process and rolling back gains that had been made in previous contracts.
Stay tuned for more updates in a couple of weeks.
3/21
At the Specials Coalition Bargaining table we passed a package of three proposals that all focus on safety. Two of the proposals are seeking to expand Letters of Agreement to the whole coalition that have been working successfully for a single agency. One outlines what happens when elevators are inoperable, and another creates a structure for workers to follow if they work in the public and have concerns about their safety. The third letter of agreement would require that all buildings that are open to the public undergo a safety assessment.
We also passed our remote work proposal seeking to both create clarity around what a “business need” actually is and to protect people from being hired into remote work position just to have that changed later on.
Management has not given us many proposals yet but will get us the majority of them in the next session.
We also already signed our first tentative agreement on a few pieces of housekeeping (correcting typos) in an Article!
3/5
The Specials Coalition bargaining team has been hard at work advocating for your needs, below is an update from our bargaining session.
-
-
- We passed two proposals that focus on bringing equity to our smallest agencies in the coalition, the Boards. We passed one proposal focusing on bringing their comp time accruals up to where others are and another proposal to make labor management committees more accessible.
- We passed the first of our Article 45 (Filling of Vacancies) proposals and so did management. Article 45 is always a conversation at this bargaining table as we try to ensure that workers can build careers at the State.
- We also spent some time talking with management about a proposal that we previously passed which would give the union representation on hiring committees, which would create a more transparent hiring process and help people understand the skills needed to interview well.
-
Español - Русский - Tiếng Việt
6/27
We’re excited to announce that on Tuesday, June 24th, your SEIU 503 Institutions Coalition Bargaining Team reached a Tentative Agreement (TA) with management on the Institutions Coalition Table!
This agreement reflects the collective strength and solidarity of workers across Oregon State Hospital, Oregon Youth Authority, and Pendleton Cottage. Throughout this process, our priorities remained clear: safety, workload relief, fair compensation, and recognition for the difficult work you do every day. This Tentative Agreement is a significant step forward in addressing those needs.
Click here to view all the changes that were made at the Institutions Coalition Table.
What’s Next?
Each agency will now continue bargaining over their agency-specific proposals. The Coalition TA locks in improvements at the coalition level, while we stay at the table to fight for additional wins on economic issues.
Stay tuned for more updates as we push to wrap up agency-level bargaining. When all tables conclude, we’ll share the full Tentative Agreements and details about the ratification vote.
6/20
-
CNI Differential:
Management stated that they have no interest in continuing the CNI LOA without adding “parameters” (restrictions) to prevent workers from calling out frequently and then picking up CNI shifts.
We pushed back, arguing that adding limitations without increasing the differential punishes staff. Management responded that they’re only willing to increase the CNI differential for LPNs, citing those shifts as the most critical. They also claimed that there are no funds to increase the CNI for MHT staff, nor will they continue the LOA for MHTs without those added restrictions.
This unequal treatment—valuing LPNs over MHTs—left our team deeply unsettled. -
PICU Differential:
Management proposed a $1.60/hr differential for MHTs and $2.00/hr for LPNs. We stressed that this new unit brings heightened safety risks and increased complexity. These proposed amounts fall short of what’s needed to attract and retain skilled staff. Management claimed this is the maximum they can budget for and believe it will attract more experienced workers, though we made clear this is insufficient.
-
Moving Campus Operations out of the normal GLC2 bidding process. Instead, GLC2s would have to apply for these positions.
Their reasoning? They want more experienced staff in Campus Ops. What they aren’t offering: any incentive to actually encourage more tenured workers to apply.
6/13
Your Union bargaining team met with management on Friday, June 6th, and we’re happy to report a productive session with agreements reached on several key articles across agencies. Here are the highlights:
Oregon State Hospital (OSH) & Pendleton Cottage (PC)
- Promotions: When a member is denied a promotion, they can now request the interview notes and scoring. HR will also offer coaching and advice to help members strengthen their interview skills.
- Vacation Seniority Rights: Members will now be able to exercise seniority once per year when there’s a conflict over vacation requests.
- Clothing & Uniform Reimbursements:
- Facilities Workers: $200 boot reimbursement per biennium
- Vocational Services, Environmental Services, Materials Management: $150 clothing reimbursement per biennium
- All: $75 per biennium for protective eyewear
- Continuing Education: Clarified the $1,000 reimbursement for Behavioral Health Specialists, Clinical Psychologists, and Psychiatric Social Workers.
- Labor/Management Engagement: Policies and procedures will now be reviewed and discussed during Labor/Management meetings.
Oregon State Hospital (OSH) Only
- Computer Access Time: Management has committed to ensuring employees have adequate time to access computers, even if it exceeds the current 15-minute limit when necessary.
Pendleton Cottage (PC) Only
- Licensure Costs Covered: The agency will now cover licensure and recertification costs for MHT employees required to maintain QMHA certification.
Oregon Youth Authority (OYA)
- Promotion: Same improvements as OSH/PC—interview notes and scoring available upon request, plus advice and coaching from HR.
- Vacation Bidding: Clear and concise language now reflects the current practice for vacation bidding.
- Hardship Transfers: We’ve added contract language that reflects the current hardship transfer policy to provide clarity and enforceability.
- Continuing Education: Same clarification on $1,000 reimbursement for qualifying classifications as OSH/PC.
- Labor/Management Engagement: Policies and procedures will now be reviewed and discussed during Labor/Management meetings. Employees whose regular schedules conflict with committee meetings may request to temporarily modify their work schedule pursuant to Article 90--18 - Work Schedules.
We’re back at the table Tuesday, June 17th, continuing to work through important proposals—including our proposed differentials to address the unique hazards and challenges faced by our members.
5/30
The Institutions Coalition did not bargain this week due to some team members being unavailable.
5/16
On Tuesday, May 13, your bargaining team met with management to continue negotiations. We passed several proposals back and forth and are pleased to report that we’re making progress on many issues. However, there are still key areas where we remain far apart. Here's a breakdown of where things currently stand by agency:
Across All Agencies (OSH, OYA, PC)
- Labor-Management Committees (LMC): Management agreed that agency policies and procedures will be vetted through LMC. Members who sit on the committee will be able to flex their schedules if a meeting falls on their day off.
- Promotion Feedback: Management agreed to provide interview notes and scoring upon request when a member is denied a promotion. Additionally, HR will offer coaching and interview advice.
- Differentials: Management rejected the differential proposals for Food & Nutrition Services (FNS) workers who supervise patients or youth.
Oregon Youth Authority (OYA)
- Vacation Bidding: Management accepted our vacation bidding language, which was developed collaboratively through LMC.
- Promotions: We continue to push for stronger promotion language at OYA to prioritize internal candidates.
- Critical Need Incentive (CNI): Management has proposed to eliminate the CNI at OYA entirely, effective July 1. We are pushing back on this and remain in active negotiations.
- Hazardous Workplace Differential: Management rejected our proposal to provide a differential for those working in specialized management units.
Oregon State Hospital (OSH)
- Boots/Uniforms: Management agreed to include Vocational Services workers assigned to the woodshop, greenhouse, and landscaping crews to the boots/uniforms language. They also agreed to increase the boots reimbursement for Facilities to $200 per biennium and for EVS, Voc Services, Materials Management, to be increased to $150 per biennium. Additionally, they agreed to increase the protective eyewear reimbursement by $25.
- Remote Work for 12-Hour Staff: Our proposal to allow 12-hour shift workers to complete 4 hours of their shift remotely was rejected. Discussions are ongoing.
- CNI Proposal: Management wants to require zero unscheduled absences in the 14 days prior to receiving a CNI. We continue to push back on this restriction.
- Differentials: Our proposals for clerical staff working within the secure perimeter and Activity Coordinators performing Peer Support duties were also rejected. We are still in discussions on these as well as the differential for the PICU.
Pendleton Cottage (PC)
- Licensure & Recertification Fees: Management agreed to cover QMHA licensure and recertification fees to MHTs required to hold this certification.
- Custodian Differential: Custodians will now be added to the differential language of 10% for parity with OSH.
5/2
Your bargaining team met with management on April 29 and responded to their 4/18 package with one of our own. Here's what this package proposal included organized by agency:
All Agencies
- Investigatory notices from HR should include the reason, date, time, and location of the event being investigated.
- Labor-Management Committees should regularly review policies and procedures to identify problems early.
- Employees who are passed over for promotion should be able to request their interview notes and scoring.
- We’re continuing to push for stronger oversight of investigations and discipline to track patterns and ensure fairness.
Oregon State Hospital (OSH) and Pendleton Cottage
- We agreed to the $10.00 meal penalty payment but continue to push for real meals from Kirkbride and Valley Cafes instead of freezer-burnt TV dinners, we also shared photos of the TV dinner freezer-burnt meals and the unsafe food storage (freezer being held shut with a lanyard) to back this up.
- We countered that if an employee is mandated, they should receive an email confirmation and the penalty payment form.
- We’re also continuing to push for dieticians to be included in the Continuing Education reimbursement LOA.
- We did get agreement that during vacation scheduling seniority can be utilized once per year instead of once every two years.
Oregon Youth Authority (OYA)
- We proposed that internal candidates be considered before external applicants for promotions.
Management gave us another package proposal, but they rejected all of the differentials we have proposed. They did counter with a $25 increase to protective eyewear but rejected any increases to boots/uniforms. Their package included agreement to cover QMHA recertification costs at Pendleton Cottage and added language at OYA to limit emergency reassignments across classifications. They refused to increase the 15-minute computer access time, but added language for OSH only that would ensure enough time is scheduled for required trainings and reviews in Workday.
4/18
The coalition bargaining team met with management on April 15, 2025. At this session, management passed a package proposal responding to several of our proposals.
Management's counter proposals are as follows:
- Promotional language at OYA - Management agreed to adding promotional language for OYA. While management did reject our proposal to require internal consideration before external posting, management proposed that all postings be open, competitive and current employees who meet the minimum qualifications will be guaranteed an interview and full consideration.
- For all agencies within the Institutions coalition - Management agreed to provide interview notes and scoring to employees who are not selected for promotion. HR will make interview coaching and advice available upon request, though they rejected our proposal for structured career advancement training.
- Vacation Scheduling at OSH and Pendleton Cottage - We proposed allowing employees to exercise vacation scheduling seniority three times every two calendar years (an increase from once every two years). Management countered with allowing it once per calendar year.
- Labor Management Committee Participation - Management agreed that LMC members may request to temporarily modify their schedule when an LMC meeting falls on their day off.
- Mandate and Meal Penalties - Management rejected our proposal to increase penalty pay for mandates but countered with an increase to meal penalty payments. They also rejected our proposal to provide meals from on-site cafés during extended shifts.
We tentatively agreed to a proposal for OSH and Pendleton Cottage which provides that effective November 1st of each year, any compensatory time exceeding 60 hours will be automatically cashed out. This eliminates the need for employees to request to carry over the allowed 60 hours into the next year. However, if an employee wishes to cash out any portion of the 60-hour balance, they can initiate that request.
We continue to push for improvements that recognize the value of your work and time. The next session is scheduled for April 29th, and we’ll keep you informed every step of the way.
4/4
We met with management on Tuesday, April 1st for bargaining. This was the final meeting to introduce new proposals, and we passed a total of 13 proposals.
Our first applies to all workers across the coalition and recognizes the critical role they play, especially when required to report in person while others work remotely. In these situations, we propose employees receive time-and-a-half for all hours worked, in exchange for waiving the current $3.00/hour essential worker differential.
At Oregon State Hospital, we proposed several improvements. Employees under investigation could choose to receive questions in writing and submit written responses in advance, giving the employer flexibility to continue the process or accept the written statement as final. We also proposed extending computer access time from 15 to 30 minutes. Additional proposals include a 5% differential for Office Specialist 2s with regular client contact, and a 10% differential for Food Service Workers and Cooks supervising clients. We also called for increased allowances for protective eyewear and boots, and expanding boot coverage to Vocational Services. A differential was also proposed for Activity Coordinators who hold Peer Support Specialist or Traditional Health Worker certifications, recognizing their added responsibilities.
For Pendleton Cottage, we proposed a 5% differential for Mental Health Therapists required to maintain QMHA certification, along with reimbursement for recertification and continuing education costs.
At Oregon Youth Authority, proposals include ensuring staff are not reassigned outside their classification and that mandatory overtime stays within classification—while still allowing voluntary cross-classification overtime. We also proposed increases to penalty pay and meal reimbursements to reflect inflation, a compensatory time cap increase from 80 to 200 hours (matching OSH), and a 10% differential for employees working in Specialized Management Units. Lastly, we proposed clear timelines and collaborative procedures for vacation bidding and request approvals.
Management proposed 12 hour shifts at OSH, a very small differential for those assigned to the PICU, eliminating the OYA Critical Need Incentive and added an expectation for the OSH Critical Needs Incentive that employees must have worked all of their regularly scheduled hours (except for prescheduled paid time off or approved bereavement leave) in the 14 days prior to working a CNI shift to be eligible.
3/21
The institutions coalition bargaining team did not meet with management this past week. Both teams spent time preparing to pass proposals, so they are ready for the last bargaining session before the deadline, which is on April 1.
3/4
During this session, we put forward proposals aimed at improving working conditions, financial fairness, and career advancement opportunities for our members.
Here’s what we proposed:
-
- Article 32.2 to increase the penalty pay, and penalty meal reimbursement as well as clarified that provided meals would come from the institution’s cafe.
- We passed proposals on Article 45.2 to create language that when denied a promotion, the notes and scoring of the interview will be provided upon request, and that HR will provide advice and coaching on interview skills and other appropriate trainings to improve the member's ability to promote in all facilities or institutions, as well as adding hardship transfer committee language for the Oregon Youth Authority.
2/21
This week marked our first coalition bargaining meetings with management. The State of Oregon workforce is divided up into four coalitions: Human Services, Institutions, ODOT and Special Agencies. We also negotiate at Central Table, where language that impacts everyone (including pay increases) is bargained. We will hold our first meeting at Central Table on Thursday, February 27th at 1:30pm.
At the Institutions table we made an opening statement highlighting the challenges workers face every day working in this coalition. We passed proposals around more transparency to increase notification around policy changes, investigations and discipline. We also made a proposal to increase how often seniority could be used in a year at OSH and Pendleton Cottage.
Management proposed that comp time exceeding 60 hours will be automatically cashed out during the annual period, eliminating the requirement to provide hard copies of disciplines, and GLCs at OYA having the ability to bid on shift assignments immediately upon hire vs. waiting to pass trial service.
Share Your Story!
Use this recording software to share a short video directly from your device. We want to hear from our members and share those messages with the State of Oregon and the public to make sure we have a successful bargaining campaign. If we like your story we may reach out for more information or to invite you to join our Storytellers’ Bureau. Please fill out the release at this link if you record a video that we can use.
If you consider yourself a good speaker, a passionate story teller or you just know you could get the point across go ahead and apply to be a member of our Storyteller’s Bureau!
Tell Your StoryJoin The Contract Action TeamDigital Toolkit
What is mediation and Why do we do it?
Our bargaining teams request mediation for a number of different reasons depending on what is happening in that bargaining campaign. Often, we request mediation as soon as possible to keep our future options open. The Public Employee Collective Bargaining Act (PECBA) outlines a timeline for our bargaining processes – it dictates how long we have to bargain before we can request mediation, how long we have to be in mediation, etc. before we can utilize options like a strike or binding arbitration. So, in many campaign cycles we request mediation before we really need it to keep moving our timeline forward. Sometimes, we request mediation because we know that the mediator’s work will be essential to settling the contract.
So, what is mediation? Mediation is a process in which a mediator joins the two bargaining teams in their bargaining sessions to work with both teams in reaching an agreement. The work of the mediator can happen in different ways – sometimes the mediator will shuttle messages back and forth between the teams. Sometimes the mediator will facilitate conversations between the two teams. The hope is that by having the mediator work with the teams that they are able to explore new options and/or have different conversations than they have been so that they can reach a settlement.
Memory Lane – Let’s remember the contract fight from 2023!
Meet the Central Table Bargaining Team!
- Chairs: Angela Ward (ODFW) & Joe Dyer (Pendleton Cottage)
- Ibrahim Coulibaly (BOLI)
- Ritchie Maes (ODOT)
- Austin Folnagy (Employment Department)
- Jesse Rodriguez (OSH)
- Jordan Meyer (ODHS)
- Rachelle Mullins (ODHS)
- Tracy Thompson (DCBS)
- Sarah Heinsohn (OPRD)
Feel free to contact them here: stateworkerbargaining@seiu503.org
2025 State Coalition Tables Bargaining Delegates
The State of Oregon contract is divided into 4 coalitions based on agencies doing similar work. Here are the elected bargaining delegates representing their agencies at the coalition bargaining tables.| Human Services | ODOT | Specials | Institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Em Johnson - DHS | Tash Wilson - ODA | Thomas Prislac - DOR | Joseph Dyer - OHA |
| Rachelle Mullins - DHS | Vaughn Balzer - ODOT | Tamera Combs - DOR | Debbie Shook - OYA |
| Tylor Carney - DHS | Lee Erickson - ODOT | Thorsten Geissler - DOR | Benjamin Moul - OYA |
| Joshua May - DHS | Phil Smith - ODOT | Lynette Jacobs - DOR | Tim VonSeggern - OYA |
| Jordan Meyer - DHS | Ritchie Maes - ODOT | Kathy Lamar - DOJ | Jesse Rodriguez - OSH |
| Makensi Reyes - DHS | Lon Stockebrand - ODOT | Jasmine Snyder - DOJ | Shawn Holliday - OSH |
| Jennifer McGarvin - OHA | Jason Lawrence - ODOT | Wanda Martinez - DOJ | Wendy VonSeggern - OSH |
| Chelsea Alionar - OHA | Kelly Lawrence - ODFW | Aunika Lawrence - DOJ | Scott Walliman - OSH |
| Janet Rosen - DHS | Angela Ward - ODFW | Paulita Peña Urenda - ODE | Andrew Manibusan - OSH |
| Tia Sanchez - OED | Michelle Jones - ODFW | Travis Moore - ODE | Randall Davis - OSH |
| Austin Folnagy - OED | Michelle Godin - DMV | Andrew Milne - ODE | Jennifer Cash - OSH |
| Matt DeRosa - OED | Peggy Howard - DMV | James Horton - TSPC | Timothy Warren - OSH |
| Aidan Kolar - OED | Aisha Young - ODA | Noelle Scott - DAS | |
| Kathleen Olson - OED | Norma Verley - DMV | Andy Townsend - OHCS | |
| Joellen Billington - DHS | Daniel Mears - DMV | Sarah Mentzer - OHCS | |
| Justin Dreyer - DHS | Michael Williams - ODA | Jeni Hall Peel - DAS | |
| Martin Ramirez - DHS | Austin Leep - OWRD | Elaine Schacher - DAS | |
| Roberto Perez Benitez - OED | Arla Davis - OWRD | William McLaughlin - ODVA | |
| Tauni Penner - DHS | Sarah Heinsohn - OPRD | Tracy Thompson - DCBS | |
| Kristine Walker - DHS | Jennifer Burnett - OPRD | Khadija Mostafa - DCBS | |
| Victor Rios - DHS | Elika Paki - OPRD | David Mohrman - DCBS | |
| Matthew Goolsby - ODF | Jerry Curry - OSL | ||
| David Showalter - ODF | Tyler Bernstein - Treasury | ||
| Megan Frizzel - ODF | April Hergert - HECC | ||
| Michele Huffman - ODF | Stephanie Solomon - HECC | ||
| Ibrahim Coulibaly - BOLI | |||
| Alicia Cowan - BOP | |||
| Kimberly Johnson - PERS | |||
| Susan Kay Mundell - PERS | |||
| Orion Lumiere - OCB |